Parallel concatenated code with soft-in soft-out interactive turbo decoder

ABSTRACT

A method for parallel concatenated (Turbo) encoding and decoding. Turbo encoders receive a sequence of input data tuples and encode them. The input sequence may correspond to a sequence of an original data source, or to an already coded data sequence such as provided by a Reed-Solomon encoder. A turbo encoder generally comprises two or more encoders separated by one or more interleavers. The input data tuples may be interleaved using a modulo scheme in which the interleaving is according to some method (such as block or random interleaving) with the added stipulation that the input tuples may be interleaved only to interleaved positions having the same modulo-N (where N is an integer) as they have in the input data sequence. If all the input tuples are encoded by all encoders then output tuples can be chosen sequentially from the encoders and no tuples will be missed. If the input tuples comprise multiple bits, the bits may be interleaved independently to interleaved positions having the same modulo-N and the same bit position. This may improve the robustness of the code. A first encoder may have no interleaver or all encoders may have interleavers, whether the input tuple bits are interleaved independently or not. Modulo type interleaving also allows decoding in parallel.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED PATENTS/PATENT APPLICATIONS

The present U.S. Utility Patent Application claims priority pursuant to35 U.S.C. § 120, as a division, to the following U.S. Utility PatentApplication which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in itsentirety and made part of the present U.S. Utility Patent Applicationfor all purposes:

1. U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 09/878,148, entitled “Parallelconcatenated code with soft-in soft-out interactive turbo decoder,”filed Jun. 8, 2001 (Jun. 8, 2001), pending, which claims prioritypursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to the following U.S. Provisional PatentApplications which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in theirentirety and made part of the present U.S. Utility Patent Applicationfor all purposes:

1. U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/232,053, entitled“Turbo trellis encoder and decoder,” filed Sep. 12, 2000 (Sep. 12,2000).

2. U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/232,288, entitled“Parallel concatenated code with SISO interactive turbo decoder,” filedSep. 12, 2000 (Sep. 12, 2000).

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Technical Field of the Invention

The invention relates to methods, apparatus, and signals used in channelcoding and decoding, and, in particular embodiments to methods,apparatus and signals for use with turbo and turbo-trellis encoding anddecoding for communication channels.

2. Description of Related Art

A significant amount of interest has recently been paid to channelcoding. For example a recent authoritative text states:

“Channel coding refers to the class of signal transformations designedto improve communications performance by enabling the transmittedsignals to better withstand the effects of various channel impairments,such as noise, interference, and fading. These signal-processingtechniques can be thought of as vehicles for accomplishing desirablesystem trade-offs (e.g., error-performance versus bandwidth, powerversus bandwidth). Why do you suppose channel coding has become such apopular way to bring about these beneficial effects? The use oflarge-scale integrated circuits (LSI) and high-speed digital signalprocessing (DSP) techniques have made it possible to provide as much as10 dB performance improvement through these methods, at much less costthan through the use of most other methods such as higher powertransmitters or larger antennas.”

From “Digital Communications” Fundamentals and Applications SecondEdition by Bernard Sklar, page 305 © 2001 Prentice Hall PTR.

Stated differently, improved coding techniques may provide systems thatcan operate at lower power or may be used to provide higher data rates.

Conventions and Definitions:

Particular aspects of the invention disclosed herein depend upon and aresensitive to the sequence and ordering of data. To improve the clarityof this disclosure the following convention is adopted. Usually, itemsare listed in the order that they appear. Items listed as #1, #2, #3 areexpected to appear in the order #1, #2, #3 listed, in agreement with theway they are read, i.e. from left to right. However, in engineeringdrawings, it is common to show a sequence being presented to a block ofcircuitry, with the right most tuple representing the earliest sequence,as shown in FIG. 2, where 207 is the earliest tuple, followed by tuple209. The IEEE Standard Dictionary of Electrical and Electronics Terms,Sixth Edition, defines tuple as a suffix meaning an ordered set of terms(sequence) as in N-tuple. A tuple as used herein is merely a grouping ofbits having a relationship to each other.

Herein, the convention is adopted that items, such as tuples will bewritten in the same convention as the drawings. That is in the orderthat they sequentially proceed in a circuit. For example, “Tuples 207and 209 are accepted by block 109” means tuple 207 is accepted first andthen 209 is accepted, as is seen in FIG. 2. In other words the text willreflect the sequence implied by the drawings. Therefore a description ofFIG. 2 would say “tuples 207 and 209 are provided to block 109” meaningthat tuple 207 is provided to block 109 before tuple 209 is provided toblock 109.

Herein an interleaver is defined as a device having an input and anoutput. The input accepting data tuples and the output providing datatuples having the same component bits as the input tuples, except fororder.

An integral tuple (IT) interleaver is defined as an interleaver thatreorders tuples that have been presented at the input, but does notseparate the component bits of the input tuples. That is the tuplesremain as integral units and adjacent bits in an input tuple will remainadjacent, even though the tuple has been relocated. The tuples, whichare output from an IT interleaver are the same as the tuples input tointerleaver, except for order. Hereinafter when the term interleaver isused, an IT interleaver will be meant.

A separable tuple (ST) interleaver is defined as an interleaver thatreorders the tuples input to it in the same manner as an IT interleaver,except that the bits in the input tuples are interleaved independently,so that bits that are adjacent to each other in an input tuple areinterleaved separately and are interleaved into different output tuples.Each bit of an input tuple, when interleaved in an ST interleaver, willtypically be found in a different tuple than the other bits of the inputtuple from where it came. Although the input bits are interleavedseparately in an ST interleaver, they are generally interleaved into thesame position within the output tuple as they occupied within the inputtuple. So for example, if an input tuple comprising two bits, a mostsignificant bit and a least significant bit, is input into an STinterleaver the most significant bit will be interleaved into the mostsignificant bit position in a first output tuple and the leastsignificant bit will be interleaved into the least significant bitposition in a second output tuple.

Modulo-N sequence designation is a term meaning the modulo-N of theposition of an element in a sequence. If there are k item s⁽¹⁾ in asequence then the items have ordinal numbers 0 to k−1, i.e. I₀ throughI_((k−1)) representing the position of each time in the sequence. Thefirst item in the sequence occupies position 0, the second item in asequence I₁ occupies position 1, the third item in the sequence I₂occupies position 2 and so forth up to item I_(k−1), which occupies thek′th or last position in the sequence. The modulo-N sequence designationis equal to the position of the item in the sequence modulo-N . Forexample, the modulo-2 sequence designation of I₀=0, the modulo-2sequence designation of I₁=1, and the modulo-2 sequence designation ofI₂=0 and so forth.

A modulo-N interleaver is defined as an interleaver wherein theinterleaving function depends on the modulo-N value of the tuple inputto the interleaver. Modulo interleavers are further defined andillustrated herein.

A modulo-N encoding system is one that employs one or more modulointerleavers.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In one aspect of the invention, the disclosure illustrates the use of anonsystematic component code in a parallel concatenated (turbo)encoding.

In another aspect of the invention, the disclosure illustrates the useof modulo encoding in which binary N-tuples (groups of N bits) areinterleaved to positions depending on the modulo value of theirsequential location (modulo position) in an input data stream.

In yet another aspect of the invention, methods of creating modulointerleavers from a seed sequence are disclosed.

In yet another illustrative aspect of the invention, modulo interleavingis used in turbo-trellis coded modulation (TTCM) encoders.

In another aspect of the invention, non-traditional constellationmapping is used with TTCM encoders.

In a further aspect of the invention, modulo encoding techniques areused to enable a parallel decoding of properly encoded signals atwhatever degree of parallelism is desired.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS

The features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention whichhave been described in the above summary will be better understood withregard to the following description, appended claims, and accompanyingdrawings where:

FIG. 1 is a graphical illustration of an environment in whichembodiments of the present invention may operate.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a portion of a signal encoder according toan embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a parallel concatenated (turbo) encoder,illustrating the difference between systematic and nonsystematic forms.

FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of a rate 2/3 “feed forward” convolutionalnonsystematic encoder.

FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram of a rate 2/3 “recursive” convolutionalnonsystematic encoder.

FIG. 6 is a trellis diagram of the convolutional encoder illustrated inFIG. 5.

FIG. 7 is a block diagram of a turbo-trellis coded modulation (TTCM)encoder.

FIG. 8A is a block diagram of a TTCM encoder utilizing multipleinterleavers.

FIG. 8B is a graphical illustration of the process of modulointerleaving.

FIG. 8C is a further graphical illustration of the process of modulointerleaving.

FIG. 9 is a block diagram of a TTCM encoder employing a tupleinterleaver.

FIG. 10 is a block diagram of a TTCM encoder employing a bitinterleaver.

FIG. 11A is a first portion of combination block diagram and graphicalillustration of a rate 2/3 TTCM encoder employing a ST interleaver,according to an embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 11B is a second portion of combination block diagram and graphicalillustration of a rate 2/3 TTCM encoder employing a ST interleaver,according to an embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 12 is a combination block diagram and graphical illustration ofrate 1/2 parallel concatenated encoder (PCE) employing a modulo-NInterleaver.

FIG. 13 is a graphical illustration of the functioning of a modulo-4 STinterleaver, according to an embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 14A is a graphical illustration of the generation of interleaversequences from a seed interleaving sequence.

FIG. 14B is a graphical illustration of a process by which modulo-2 andmodulo-3 interleaving sequences may be generated.

FIG. 14C is a graphical illustration of a process by which a modulo-4interleaving sequence may be generated.

FIG. 15 is a graphical illustration of trellis encoding.

FIG. 16 is a graphical illustration of Turbo Trellis Coded Modulation(TTCM) encoding.

FIG. 17 is a graphical illustration of a rate 2/3 TTCM encoder accordingto an embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 18A is a graphical illustration of a rate 1/2 TTCM encoder, withconstituent 2/3 rate encoders, according to an embodiment of theinvention.

FIG. 18B is a graphical illustration of alternate configurations of therate 1/2 TTCM encoder illustrated in FIG. 18A.

FIG. 18C is a graphical illustration of alternate configurations of therate 1/2 TTCM encoder illustrated in FIG. 18A.

FIG. 18D is a graphical illustration of alternate configurations of therate 1/2 TTCM encoder illustrated in FIG. 18A.

FIG. 18E is a graphical illustration of alternate configurations of therate 1/2 TTCM encoder illustrated in FIG. 18A.

FIG. 19 is a graphical illustration of a rate 3/4 TTCM encoder, withconstituent 2/3 rate encoders, according to an embodiment of theinvention.

FIG. 20A is a graphical illustration of a rate 5/6 TTCM encoder, withconstituent 2/3 rate encoders, according to an embodiment of theinvention.

FIG. 20B is a graphical illustration which represents an alternateencoding that will yield the same coding rate as FIG. 20A.

FIG. 21A is a graphical illustration of a rate 8/9 TTCM encoder, withconstituent 2/3 rate encoders, according to an embodiment of theinvention.

FIG. 21B is a graphical illustration which represents an alternateencoding that will yield the same coding rate as FIG. 21A.

FIG. 22 is a graphical illustration of map 0 according to an embodimentof the invention.

FIG. 23 is a graphical illustration of map 1 according to an embodimentof the invention.

FIG. 24 is a graphical illustration of map 2 according to an embodimentof the invention.

FIG. 25 is a graphical illustration of map 3 according to an embodimentof the invention.

FIG. 26 is a block diagram of a modulo-2 (even/odd) TTCM decoderaccording to an embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 27 is a TTCM modulo-4 decoder according to an embodiment of theinvention.

FIG. 28 is a graphical illustration of a modulo-N encoder/decoder systemaccording to an embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 29 is a graphical illustration of the output of the TTCM encoderillustrated in FIG. 17.

FIG. 30 is a graphical illustration of the tuple types produced by theTTCM encoder illustrated in FIG.18A.

FIG. 31 is a graphical illustration illustrating the tuple typesproduced by the rate 3/4 encoders of FIG. 19.

FIG. 32 is a graphical illustration of the tuple types produced by therate 5/6 encoder illustrated in FIG. 20A.

FIG. 33 is a chart defining the types of outputs produced by the 8/9thencoder illustrated in FIG. 21A.

FIG. 34 is a further graphical illustration of a portion of the decoderillustrated in FIG. 26.

FIG. 35 is a graphical illustration of the process carried on within themetric calculator of the decoder.

FIG. 36 is a graphical illustration of the calculation of a Euclideansquared distance metric.

FIG. 37 is a representation of a portion of a trellis diagram as may bepresent in either SISO 2606 or SISO 2608.

FIG. 38 is a generalized illustration of a forward state metric alphaand a reverse state metric beta.

FIG. 39A is a block diagram folder illustrating the parallel SISOcoupling illustrated in FIG. 26.

FIG. 39B is a block diagram of a modulo-N type decoder.

FIG. 40 is a block diagram illustrating the workings of a SISO such asthat illustrated at 3901, 3957, 2606 or 2701.

FIG. 41 is a graphical representation of the processing of alpha valueswithin a SISO such as illustrated at 3901, 4000 or 2606.

FIG. 42 is a graphical illustration of the alpha processing within theSISO 4000.

FIG. 43 is a block diagram further illustrating the read-writearchitecture of the decoder as illustrated in FIG. 2606.

FIG. 44 is a graphical illustration illustrating the generation ofdecoder sequences.

FIG. 45 is a graphical illustration of a decoder trellis according to anembodiment of the invention.

FIG. 46A is a graphical illustration of a method for applying the min*operation to four different values.

FIG. 46B is a graphical illustration further illustrating the use of themin* operation.

FIG. 47 is a graphical illustration of two methods of performingelectronic addition.

FIG. 48 is a block diagram in which a carry sum adder is added to a min*circuit according to an embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 49 is a graphical illustration of min* calculation.

FIG. 50 is a graphical illustration of the computation of the logportion of the min* operation assuming that Δ is positive, as well asnegative.

FIG. 51 is a graphical illustration of a min* circuit according to anembodiment of the invention.

FIG. 51A is a graphical illustration of the table used by the logsaturation block of FIG. 51.

FIG. 51B is a graphical illustration of a simplified version of thetable of FIG. 51A.

FIG. 52 is a graphical illustration and circuit diagram indicating theway in which alpha values within a SISO are normalized.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

FIG. 1 is a graphic illustration of an environment in which embodimentsof the present invention may operate. The environment illustrated at 101is an information distribution system, such as may be found in a cabletelevision distribution system.

In FIG. 1 data is provided to the system from an information source 103.For purposes of illustration, the information source displayed in FIG. 1may be considered to be a cable television system head end whichprovides video data to end users. A formatter 105 accepts data from theinformation source 103. The data provided by information source 103 maycomprise analog or digital signals such as (but not limited to) videosignals, audio signals, and data signals. The formatter block 105accepts the data from the information source and formats it into anappropriate form, such as message tuples, which are illustrated at 107.The formatted data is then provided to a channel encoder 109. Channelencoder 109 encodes that data provided to it. In some embodiments of thepresent invention, the channel encoder 109 may provide an encoding, withdifferent goals depending on the particular implementation, for exampleto make the signal more robust, to reduce the error probability, tooperate the system using less transmission power or to enable a moreefficient decoding of the signal. Channel encoder 109 then provides theencoded data to a transmitter 111. The transmitter transmits the encodeddata provided to it by the channel encoder 109, for example, using anantenna 113. The signal broadcast from antenna 113 is received by arelay satellite 115 and then rebroadcast to a receiving terrestrialantenna, such as earth station antenna 117. Earth station antenna 117collects the satellite signal and provides the collected signal to areceiver 119. The receiver 119 will amplify and demodulate/detect thesignal as appropriate and provide the detected signal to a decoder 121.Decoder 121 will essentially, reverse the process of the channel encoder109 and recreate the message tuples 123, which should represent a goodestimate of the message tuples 107 that had been broadcast. The decoder121 may use Forward Error Correction (FEC), in order to correct errorsin the received signal. The tuples 123 provided by the decoder are thenprovided to a formatting unit 125, which prepares the received messagetuples for use by an information sink, such as the television displayillustrated at 127.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a portion of a signal encoder according toan embodiment of the invention. In FIG. 2 message tuples 107 areprovided to channel encoder 109. Channel encoder 109 comprises aReed-Solomon unit 201, which provides a first encoding of the messagetuples 107. The output of the Reed-Solomon (RS) unit 201 which includesa RS encoder and may include an interleaver and may include aninterleaver, is then provided a turbo trellis-coded modulation (TTCM)encoder 208. The output of the Reed-Solomon unit 201 is then provided toa turbo encoder 203, which applies a parallel concatenated (turbo)encoding to the input received from the Reed-Solomon unit 201, andfurther provides it to a mapper 205. In addition, some of the bits ofthe data output from the Reed-Solomon unit 201 may bypass the turboencoder 203 entirely and be coupled directly into the mapper 205. Suchdata bits which bypass the turbo encoder 203 are commonly referred to asuncoded bits. The uncoded bits are taken into account in the mapper 205but are never actually encoded in the turbo encoder 203. In someembodiments of the invention there are no uncoded bits. In otherembodiments of the invention there may be several uncoded bits dependingon the data rate of the overall turbo trellis-coded modulation (TTCM)encoder desired. The output of the Reed-Solomon unit 201 may vary inform depending on the overall rate desired from the TTCM encoder 208.Turbo encoders, such as that illustrated at 203, may have a variety offorms and classifications. One of the classifications of encoders ingeneral and turbo encoders in particular is illustrated in FIG. 3.

FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a parallel concatenated encoderillustrating the difference between systematic and nonsystematic forms.In FIG. 3 data is input into the circuit at 301. Data is output from theparallel concatenated encoder (PCE) circuit 300 at 303. The data output303 of the PCE illustrated at 300 may reach the output via threedifferent paths. Input data tuples (groups of one or more bits) may bereceived at 301 and coupled directly to the data output 303 throughselector mechanism 305 along the path labeled D. The data input may alsobe coupled into a first encoder 307 where it will be encoded and thencoupled along the path E₁ through selector 305 and into data output 303.The data accepted into the PCE circuit at 301 may also be provided to aninterleaver 309. Interleaver 309 rearranges the input sequence of thedata accepted by the PCE circuit at 301. In other words, the interleavershuffles the order of the data so that the data out of the interleaver309 is not the same order as the data into the interleaver 309. The dataout of the interleaver 309 is then provided to a second encoder 311. Thesecond encoder 311 encodes the data provided to it by the interleaver309 and then provides the encoded data along path E₂ through theselector 305 into the data output 303. If the selector 305 selects thedata from path D and E₁ and E₂, where D represents all of the input datatuple, then a systematic-type turbo encoding is performed. However, ifthe data selector selects only between path E₁ and E₂, such that thereis no direct path between the data input and data output, anonsystematic turbo encoding is performed. In general the data input at301 comprises input data tuples which are to be encoded. The data outputat 303 comprises code words, which are the encoded representation of theinput data tuples. In general, in a systematic type of encoding, theinput tuples are used as part of the output code words to which theycorrespond. Within parallel concatenated encoders, such as thatillustrated at 300, encoders such as the first encoder 307 and secondencoder 311 are commonly referred to as component or constituentencoders because they provide encoding, which are used as components ofthe overall turbo encoding. The first encoder 307 and the second encoder311 may also have a variety of forms and may be of a variety of types.For example, the first encoder 307 may be a block encoder or aconvolutional-type encoder. Additionally, the second encoder 311 mayalso be a block or convolutional-type encoder. The first and secondencoders themselves may also be of systematic or nonsystematic form. Thetypes of encoders may be mixed and matched so that, for example, thefirst encoder 307 may comprise a nonsystematic encoder and secondencoder 311 may comprise a systematic-type encoder.

Constituent encoders, such as first encoder 307 and second encoder 311may have delays incorporated within them. The delays within the encodersmay be multiple clock period delays so that the data input to theencoder is operated on for several encoder clock cycles before thecorresponding encoding appears at the output of the encoder.

One of the forms of a constituent encoder is illustrated in FIG. 4.

FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of a rate two-thirds feed forwardnonsystematic convolutional encoder. The encoder illustrated at 400 inFIG. 4 is a rate two-thirds because there are two inputs 401 and 403 andthree outputs 405, 407 and 409. Accordingly, for each input tuplecomprising two input bits 401 and 403, which are accepted by the encoder400, the output is a code word having three bits 405, 407 and 409.Therefore, for each two bits input at inputs 401 and 403 three bits areoutput at 405, 407 and 409. The encoder of FIG. 4 comprises three delays417, 419 and 421. Such delays may be formed from D-type flip flops orany other suitable delay or storage element. The rate two-thirds feedforward encoder of FIG. 4 also comprises five modulo-2 adders 411, 413,415, 423 and 425. Modulo-2 adders are adders in which the outputs of themodulo-2 adder is equal to the modulo-2 sum of the inputs. Delayelements 417, 419 and 421 are clocked by an encoder clock. Modulo-2adders 411, 413, 415, 423 and 425 are combinational circuits which areunclocked. In combinational circuits the output appears a time delayafter the inputs are changed. This time delay is due to the propagationtime of the signal within the combinational circuits (this delay isassumed as a near zero delay herein) and not due to any clockingmechanisms. In contrast, a delay unit, such as 417, will not change itsoutput until it receives an appropriate clock signal. Therefore, for aninput signal to propagate, for example from input 403 through modulo-2adder 411, through delay 417, through modulo-2 adder 413, through delay419, through modulo-2 adder 415, through delay 421 in order to appear atoutput 409, the encoder clock 427 must first clock the input signal from403 through delay unit 417, then through delay unit 419, and finallythrough delay unit 421. Therefore, once an input signal appears at 403three encoder clocks 427 in succession will be required for theresultant output 409, which is associated with that input at 403, to beseen at the output.

The encoder of FIG. 4 is a feed forward encoder. The signal is alwaysfed forward and at no point in the circuit is there a path to feed backa signal from a later stage to an earlier stage. As a consequence a feedforward encoder, such as that illustrated in FIG. 4, is a finite impulseresponse (FIR) type of state machine. That is, for an impulse signalapplied at the input, the output will eventually settle into a stablestate.

The encoder illustrated in FIG. 4 may further be classified as anonsystematic encoder because none of the inputs, that is either 401 or403, appear at the output of the encoder. That is outputs 405, 407 or409 don't reproduce the inputs in an encoded output associated with thatinput. This can be inferred from the fact that output 407, 405 and 409have no direct connection to inputs 401 or 403.

FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram of a rate two-thirds, recursive,convolutional nonsystematic encoder. The encoder of FIG. 5 is similar tothe encoder of FIG. 4 in that both encoders are nonsystematic andconvolutional. The encoder of FIG. 5 is the same schematically as theencoder of FIG. 4 with the addition of a third input at modulo-2 adder511 and a third input at modulo-2 adder 515. The third input for each ofmodulo-2 adders 511 and 515 is formed by an additional modulo-2 adder527. Modulo-2 adder 527 is formed in part by the output of delay 521.Modulo-2 adder 527 receives an input from delay 521 which is provided tomodulo-2 adders 511 and 515. Accordingly the encoder of FIG. 5 isrecursive. In other words, the inputs of delays 517 and 521 arepartially formed from outputs occurring later in the signal path and fedback to an earlier stage in the circuit. Recursive encoders may exhibitoutputs that change when repeatedly clocked even when the inputs areheld constant. The encoder of FIG. 5 is a constituent encoder, and isused with an embodiment of the invention as will be described later.

FIG. 6 is a trellis diagram for the encoder illustrated in FIG. 5. Atrellis diagram is a shorthand method of defining the behavior of afinite state machine such as the basic constituent encoder illustratedin FIG. 5. The state values in FIG. 6 represent the state of theencoder. As can be seen from the trellis diagram in FIG. 6, when theencoder of FIG. 5 is in any single state, it may transition to any oneof four different states. It may transition to four different statesbecause there are two inputs to the encoder of FIG. 5 resulting in fourdifferent possible input combinations which cause transitions. If therehad been only one input to the encoder of FIG. 5, for example, if inputs501 and 503 were connected, then each state in the trellis diagram wouldhave two possible transitions. As illustrated in the trellis diagram inFIG. 6, if the encoder is in state 0, state 1, state 2 or state 3, theencoder may then transition into state 0, state 2, state 4 or state 6.However, if the encoder is in state 4, state 5, state 6 or state 7, itmay transition into state 1, state 3, state 5, or state 7.

FIG. 7 is a block diagram of a turbo trellis-coded modulation (TTCM)encoder. In FIG. 7 an input data sequence 701 is provided to an “odd”convolutional encoder 703 and an interleaver 705. The interleaver 705interleaves the input data sequence 701 and then provides the resultinginterleaved sequence to “even” convolutional encoder 707. Encoders 703and 707 are termed “odd” and “even” respectively because encodingscorresponding to odd input tuples (i.e. input tuple no. 1, 3, 5, etc.)are selected by selector 709 from encoder 703 and encodingscorresponding to even input tuples (i.e., input tuple no. 0, 2, 4, etc.)are selected by selector 709 from encoder 707. The output of either theodd convolutional encoder 703 or the even convolutional encoder 707 isselected by a selecting mechanism 709 and then passed to a mapper 710.FIG. 7 is a generalized diagram according to an embodiment of theinvention which illustrates a general arrangement for a TTCM encoder.The odd convolutional encoder 703 receives the input data sequence and,in an embodiment of the invention, convolutionally, nonsystematically,encodes the input data sequence. Even convolutional encoder 707 receivesthe same input data as the odd convolutional encoder, except that theinterleaver 705 has rearranged the order of the data. The odd and evenconvolutional encoders may be the same encoders, different encoders oreven different types of encoders. For example, the odd convolutionalencoder may be a nonsystematic encoder, whereas the even convolutionalencoder may be a systematic encoder. In fact the convolutional encoders703 and 707 may be replaced by block-type encoders such as Hammingencoders or other block-type encoders well known in the art. For thepurposes of illustration, both constituent encoders 703 and 707 aredepicted as nonsystematic, convolutional, recursive encoders asillustrated in FIG. 5. The select mechanism 709 selects, fromconvolutional encoder 703, outputs corresponding to odd tuples of theinput data sequence 701. The select mechanism 709 selects, fromconvolutional encoder 707, outputs which correspond to even tuples ofthe input data sequence 701. Select mechanism 709 alternates inselecting symbols from the odd convolutional encoder 703 and the evenconvolutional encoder 707. The selector 709 provides the selectedsymbols to the mapper 710. The mapper 710 then maps the output of eitherthe even convolutional encoder 707 or the odd convolutional coder 703into a data constellation (not shown). In order to maintain a sequencemade up of distance segments stemming from the even and odd inputtuples, the selector 709 selects only encodings corresponding to eventuples of the input data sequence 701 from one encoder (e.g. 703), andselects only encoding corresponding to odd tuples of the input datasequence from the other encoder (e.g. 707). This can be accomplished bysynchronizing the selection of encoded tuples from the odd (703) andeven (707) encoders, for example using a clock 711, and by using anodd/even interleaver 705 to maintain an even/odd ordering of input datatuples to the even encoder 707. The odd/even interleaver 705 will bedescribed in detail later.

The encoder illustrated in FIG. 7 is a type which will be known hereinas a turbo trellis-coded modulation (TTCM) encoder. The interleaver 705,odd convolutional encoder 703, even convolutional encoder 707 andselector form a turbo encoder, also known as a parallel concatenatedencoder (PCE). The encoder is known as a parallel concatenated encoderbecause two codings are carried on in parallel. For the parallelencoding, in the FIG. 7 example one coding takes place in the oddconvolutional encoder 703, and the other takes place in the evenconvolutional encoder 707. An output is selected sequentially from eachencoder and the outputs are concatenated to form the output data stream.The mapper 710 shown in FIG. 7 provides the trellis coded modulation(TCM) function. Hence, the addition of the mapper makes the encoder aturbo trellis-type encoder. As shown in FIG. 7, the encoders may haveany number of bits in the input data tuple. It is the topology thatdefines the encoder-type.

The encoder of FIG. 7 is an illustration of only one of the possibleconfigurations that may form embodiments of the present invention. Forexample, more than one interleaver may be employed, as shown in FIG. 8.

FIG. 8A is a block diagram of a TTCM encoder using multipleinterleavers. FIG. 8A illustrates an exemplary embodiment of the presentinvention utilizing N interleavers.

The first interleaver 802 is called the null interleaver or interleaver1. Generally in embodiments of the invention the null interleaver willbe as shown in FIG. 8A, that is a straight through connection, i.e. anull interleaver. All interleaving in a system will be with respect tothe null sequence produced by the null interleaver. In the case wherethe null interleaver is merely a straight through connection the nullsequence out of the- null interleaver will be the same as the inputsequence. The concept of null interleaver is introduced as a matter ofconvenience, since embodiments of the invention may or may not have afirst interleaver a convenient way to distinguish is to say “where thefirst interleaver is the null interleaver” when the first encoderreceives input tuples directly and to say “where the first interleaveris an ST interleaver”, when an ST interleaver occupies a positionproximal to a first encoder.

In FIG. 8A source input tuples 801 are provided to encoder 811 and tointerleavers 802 through 809. There are N interleavers counting the nullinterleaver as interleaver No. 1 and N encoders present in theillustration in FIG. 8A. Other embodiments may additionally add an STinterleaver as interleaver No. 1 to process input tuples 801 prior toproviding them to encoder 811.

Source tuples T₀, T₁ and T₂ are shown as three bit tuples forillustrative purposes. However, those skilled in the art will know thatembodiments of the invention can be realized with a varying number ofinput bits in the tuples provided to the encoders. The number of inputbits and rates of encoders 811 through 819 are implementation detailsand may be varied according to implementation needs without departingfrom scope and spirit of the invention.

Interleavers 803 through 809 in FIG. 8A each receive the same sourcedata symbols 801 and produce interleaved sequences 827 through 833.Interleaved sequences 827 through 833 are further coupled into encoders813 through 819. Select mechanism 821 selects an encoded output fromencoders 811 through 819. Selector 821 selects from each encoder 811through 819 in sequence so that one encoded tuple is selected from eachencoder in one of every N+1 selections. That is the selection number 0(encoded tuple t₀) is chosen from encoder 811, the selection number 1(encoded tuple u₁ is chosen from encoder 813, V₂ is chosen from encoder815, and so forth. The same selection sequence is then repeated byselector 821.

In order not to miss any symbols, each interleaver is a modulo-typeinterleaver. To understand the meaning of the term modulo interleaver,one can consider the interleaver of FIG. 7 as a modulo-2 interleaver.The interleaver of FIG. 7 is considered a modulo-2 interleaver becauseinput tuples provided to the interleaver during odd times (i.e. providedas input tuple 1, 3, 5 etc.) will be interleaved into odd time positionsat the output of the interleaver (e.g. output tuple 77, 105, 321 etc.)That is the first tuple provided by an odd/even interleaver may be thethird, fifth, seventh, etc. tuple provided from the interleaver, but notthe second, fourth, sixth, etc. The result of any modulo-2 operationwill either be a 0 or a 1, that is even or odd respectively, thereforethe interleaver of FIG. 7 is termed a modulo-2 or odd/even interleaver.In general, according to embodiments of the invention, the value of Nfor a modulo-N interleaving system is equal to the number ofinterleavers counting the Null interleaver as the first interleaver inthe case where there is no actual first interleaver. The modulointerleaving system of FIG. 8A is modulo-N because there are Ninterleaves, including null interleaver 1, interleaving system. Theinterleavers in a modulo interleaver system may interleave randomly, Srandomly, using a block interleaver, or using any other mechanism forinterleaving known in the art, with the additional restriction thatinput/output positional integrity be maintained. When a sequence oftuples is interleaved, the modulo position value of an output will bethe same as the modulo positional value of the input tuple. The positionof a tuple modulo-N is known as a sequence designation, modulodesignation, or modulo sequence designation. For example, in a modulo-4interleaver the first tuple provided to the interleaver occupiesposition 0 of the input tuple stream. Because 0 modulo-4 is zero themodulo sequence designation of the first input tuple is 0. The tupleoccupying the position 0 may then be interleaved to a new outputposition #4, #8, #12, #16, etc., which also have the same modulosequence designation, i.e. 0. The tuples occupying output position #4,#8, #12, #16 all have a sequence designation of 0 because 4 mod 4=8 mod4=12 mod 4=16 mod 4=0. Similarly, the input tuple occupying position 2and having sequence designation of 2 may be interleaved to a new outputposition #6, #10, #14, #18, etc, which also have the same modulosequence designation of 2. The tuples in output positions #6, #10, #14,#18 etc have a modulo sequence designation of 2 because 6 mod 4=10 mod4=14 mod 4=18 mod 4=2.

For example, in FIG. 7 the modulo-2 interleaver 705, also known as anodd/even interleaver, may employ any type of interleaving scheme desiredwith the one caveat that the input data sequence is interleaved so thateach odd sequence input to the interleaver is interleaved into anotherodd sequence at the output of the interleaver. Therefore, althoughinterleaver 705 may be a random interleaver, it cannot interleave theinputs randomly to any output. It can, however, interleave any odd inputto any random odd output and interleave any even input into any randomeven interleaved output. In embodiments of the present invention, amodulo interleaving system, such as that illustrated in FIG. 8A, theinterleavers must maintain the modulo positional integrity ofinterleaved tuples. For example, if there are 5 interleavers includingthe null interleaver (numbers 0-4) in FIG. 8A, then FIG. 8A woulddescribe a modulo-5 interleaving system. In such a system, the inputsource data would be categorized by a modulo sequence number equal tothe sequence position of the source data tuple modulo-5. Therefore,every input data tuple would have a sequence value assigned to itbetween 0 and 4 (modulo-5). In each of the 5 interleavers of themodulo-5 system, source data elements (characterized using modulonumbers) could be interleaved in any fashion, as long as they wereinterleaved into an output data tuple having an output sequence modulonumber designation equal to the input sequence modulo numberdesignation. The terms modulo sequence number sequence designation,modulo position value modulo designation, modulo position all refer tothe same modulo ordering.

In other words an interleaver is a device that rearranges items in asequence. The sequence is input in a certain order. An interleaverreceives the items form the input sequence, I, in the order I₀, I₁, I₂,etc., I₀ being the first item received, I₁ being the second itemreceived, item I₂ being the third item received. Performing a modulo-Noperation on the subscript of I yields, the modulo-N position value ofeach input item. For example, if N=2 modulo-N position I₀−Mod₂(0)=0 i.e.even, modulo-N position I₁=Mod₂(1)=1 i.e., odd, modulo-N positionI₂=Mod₂(2)=0 i.e. even.

FIG. 8B is a graphical illustration of examples of modulo interleaving.Interleaving is a process by which input data tuples are mapped tooutput data tuples.

FIG. 8B illustrates of the process of modulo interleaving. As previouslystated for the purposes of this disclosure an interleaver is defined asa device having one input and one output that receives a sequence oftuples and produces an output sequence having the same bit components asthe input sequence except for order. That is, if the input sequencecontains X bits having values of one, and Y bits having values of zerothen the output sequence will also have X bits having values of 1 and Ybits having values of zero. An interleaver may reorder the input tuplesor reorder the components of the input tuples or a combination of both.In embodiments of the invention the input and output tuples of aninterleaver are assigned a modulo sequence designation which is theresult of a modulo division of the input or output number of a tuple.That is, each input tuple is assigned a sequence identifier depending onthe order in which it is accepted by the interleaver, and each outputtuple is assigned a sequence identifier depending on the order in whichit appears at the output of the interleaver.

For example, in the case of a modulo-2 interleaver the sequencedesignation may be even and odd tuples as illustrated at 850 in FIG. 8B.In such an example, the input tuple in the 0 position, indicating thatit was the first tuple provided, is designated as an even tuple T₀.Tuple T₁, which is provided after tuple T₀ is designated as an oddtuple, tuple T₂, which is provided after T₁ is designated as an eventuple and so forth. The result of the modulo interleaving is illustratedat 852. The input tuples received in order T₀, T₁, T₂, T₃, T₅, T₆ havebeen reordered to T₂, T₃, T₆, T₅, T₀, T₁, T₄. Along with the reorderedtuples at 852 is the new designation I₀ through I₆ which illustrates themodulo sequence position of the interleaved tuples.

The modulo-2 type interleaver illustrated in FIG. 8B at 854 can be anytype of interleaver, for example, a block interleaver, a shuffleinterleaver or any other type of interleaver known in the art if itsatisfies the additional constraint that input tuples are interleaved topositions in the output sequence that have the modulo position value.Therefore an input tuple having an even modulo sequence designation willalways be interleaved to an output tuple having an even modulo sequencedesignation and never will be interleaved to an output tuple having anodd modulo sequence designation. A modulo-3 interleaver 856 willfunction similarly to a modulo-2 interleaver 854 except that the modulosequence designation will not be even and odd but zero, one and two. Thesequence designation is formed by taking the modulo-3 value of the inputposition (beginning with input position 0. Referring to FIG. 8B modulo-3interleaver 856 accepts input sequence T₀, T₁, T₂, T₃, T₄, T₅ and T₆(858) and interleaves it to interleaved sequence 860: T₃, T₄, T₅, T₆,T₁, T₂ which are also designated as interleaved tuples I₀ through I₆.

As a further illustration of modulo interleaving, a modulo-8 interleaveris illustrated at 862 FIG. 8C. The modulo-8 interleaver at 862 takes aninput sequence illustrated at 864 and produces an output sequenceillustrated at 866. The input sequence is given the modulo sequencedesignations of 0 through 7 which is the input tuple number modulo-8.Similarly, the interleaved sequence is given a modulo sequencedesignation equal to the interleaved tuple number modulo-8 and reorderedcompared to the input sequence under the constraint that the newposition of each output tuple has the same modulo-8 sequence designationvalue as its corresponding input tuple.

In summary, a modulo interleaver accepts a sequence of input tupleswhich has a modulo sequence designation equal to the input tuple numbermodulo-N where N=H of the interleaver counting the null interleaver. Themodulo interleaver then produces an interleaved sequence which also hasa sequence designation equal to the interleaved tuple number divided bythe modulo of the interleaver. In a modulo interleaver bits which startout in an input tuple with a certain sequence designation must end up inan interleaved modulo designation in embodiments of the presentinvention. Each of the N interleavers in a modulo N interleaving systemwould provide for the permuting of tuples in a manner similar to theexamples in FIG. 8C; however, each interleaver would yield a differentpermutation.

The input tuple of an interleaver, can have any number of bits includinga single bit. In the case where a single bit is designated as the inputtuple, the modulo interleaver may be called a bit interleaver.

Inputs to interleavers may also be arbitrarily divided into tuples. Forexample, if 4 bits are input to in interleaver at a time then the 4 bitsmay be regarded as a single input tuple, two 2 bit input tuples or four1 bit input tuples. For the purposes of clarity of the presentapplication if 4 bits are input into an interleaver the 4 bits aregenerally considered to be a single input tuple of 4 bits. The 4 bitshowever may also be considered to be 2 of an 8 bit input tuple, two 2bit input tuples or four 1 bit input tuples the principles describedherein. If all input bits input to the interleaver are kept together andinterleaved then the modulo interleaver is designated a tupleinterleaver (a.k.a. integral tuple interleaver) because the input bitsare interleaved as a single tuple. The input bits may be alsointerleaved as separate tuples. Additionally, a hybrid scheme may beimplemented in which the input tuples are interleaved as tuples to theirappropriate sequence positions, but additionally the bits of the inputtuples are interleaved separately. This hybrid scheme has beendesignated as an ST interleaver. In an ST interleaver, input tuples witha given modulo sequence designation are still interleaved to interleavedtuples of similar sequence designations. Additionally, however, theindividual bits of the input tuple may be separated and interleaved intodifferent interleaved tuples (the interleaved tuples must all have thesame modulo sequence designation as the input tuple from which theinterleaved tuple bits were obtained). The concepts of a tuple modulointerleaver, a bit modulo interleaver, and a bit-tuple modulointerleaver are illustrated in the following drawings.

FIG. 9 is a block diagram of TTCM encoder employing a tuple typeinterleaver. In FIG. 9 an exemplary input data sequence 901 comprises asequence of data tuples T₀, T₁, T₂, T₃ and T₄. The tuples are providedin an order such that T₀ is provided first, T₁ is provided second, etc.Interleaver 915 interleaves data sequence 901. The output of theinterleaver comprises a new data sequence of the same input tuples butin different order. The data sequence 903, after interleaving, comprisesthe data tuples T₄, T₃, T₀, T₁ and T₂ in that order. The tupleinterleaver illustrated in FIG. 9 at 915 is a modulo-2 or odd/even typeinterleaver. The original data sequence 901 is provided to oddconvolutional encoder 905 and the interleaved data sequence 903 isprovided to an even convolutional encoder 907. A select mechanism 909selects encoded outputs from the odd convolutional encoder 905 and theeven convolutional encoder 907, according to the procedure providedbelow and illustrated in FIG. 9, and provides the encoder outputselected to the mapper 911. The select mechanism 909 illustrativelychooses encoded outputs from the “odd” convolutional encoder 905 thatcorrespond to odd tuples in the input data sequence 901. The selectdevice 909 also chooses encoded tuples from the even convolutionalencoder 907, that correspond to the even tuples of input sequence 903.So if the odd convolutional encoder 905 produces encoded tuples O₀, O₁,O₂, O₃ and O₄ corresponding to the input sequence of data tuples 901,the selector will select O₁ and O₃ (which have an odd modulo sequencedesignation) to pass through the mapper. In like manner if the evenconvolutional encoder produces symbols E₄, E₃, E₀, E₁ and E₂ from theinput sequence 903 and select mechanism 909 selects E₄, E₀ and E₂ andpasses those encoded tuples to the mapper 911. The mapper will thenreceive a composite data stream corresponding to encoded outputs E₄, O₁,E₀, O₃, and E₂. In this manner an encoded version of each of the inputdata sequence tuples 901 is passed onto the mapper 911. Accordingly, allof the input data sequence tuples 901 are represented in encoded form inthe data 913 which is passed onto the mapper 911. Although both encodersencode every input tuple, the encoded tuples having an odd sequencedesignation are selected from encoder 905 and the encoded tuples havingan even sequence designation are selected from encoder 907. In theinterleaver 915 of FIG. 9, each tuple is maintained as an integral tupleand there is no dividing of the bits which form the tuple. A contrastingsituation is illustrated in FIG. 10.

FIG. 10 is a block diagram of a TTCM encoder employing a bit typeinterleaver. In FIG. 10 an input tuple is represented at 1003 as inputbits i₀ through i_(k−1). The input bits i₀ through i_(k−1) are coupledinto an upper constituent encoder of 1007. The input tuple 1003 is alsocoupled into interleaver 1005. The interleaver 1005 is further dividedinto interleavers 1009, 1011 and 1013. Each of the interleavers 1009,1011 and 1013 accepts a single bit of the input tuple. The input tuple1003 is then rearranged in the interleaver 1005 such that each bitoccupies a new position in the sequence that is coupled into the lowerconstituent encoder 1015. The interleaving performed by the interleaver1005 may be any type of suitable interleaving. For example, theinterleaver may be a block interleaver a modulo interleaver aspreviously described, or any other type of interleaver as known in theart.

In the illustrated interleaver of FIG. 10 the interleaving sequenceprovided by interleaver 1005, and hence by sub-interleavers 1009, 1011and 1013, is independent of the positions of the bits within the input1003. Input tuple 1001 represents input bits which are not passedthrough either of the constituent encoders 1007 or 1015. The upperencoding 1017 comprises the uncoded input tuple 1001 plus the encodedversion of input tuple 1003, which has been encoded in the upperconstituent encoder 1007. The lower encoding 1019 comprises the uncodedinput tuple 1001 plus the output of the lower constituent encoder 1015which accepts the interleaved version of input tuple 1003. A selector1021 accepts either the upper or lower encoding and passes selectedencoding to a symbol mapper 1023.

FIG. 11A is a first part of a combination block diagram and graphicillustration of a rate 2/3 TTCM encoder employing a ST interleaveraccording to an embodiment of the invention. FIG. 11A and 11B incombination illustrate a modulo-2 ST interleaver as may be used with arate 2/3 TTCM encoder. In FIG. 11A input tuples 1101 are provided to arate 2/3 encoder 1103. The rate 2/3 encoder 1103 is designated as aneven encoder because, although it will encode every input tuple, onlythe tuples corresponding to encoded even tuples will be selected fromencoder 1103 by the selection circuit. Input tuples comprise 2 bits, amost significant bit designated by an M designation and a leastsignificant bit designated by an L designation. The first tuple thatwill be accepted by the rate 2/3 even encoder 1103 will be the eventuple 1105. The even input tuple 1105 comprises 2 bits where M₀ is themost significant bit, and L₀ is the least significant bit. The secondtuple to be accepted by the rate 2/3 even encoder 1103 is the 1107tuple. The 1107 tuple is designated as an odd tuple and comprises a mostsignificant bit M₁ and a least significant bit L₁. The input tuples aredesignated even and odd because the interleaver 1109, which is beingillustrated in FIG. 11A, is modulo-2 interleaver also known as aneven/odd interleaver.

The same principles, however, apply to any modulo-N interleaver. If themodulo interleaver had been a mod 3 interleaver instead of a mod 2interleaver then the input tuples would have sequence designations 0, 1and 2. If the modulo interleaver had been a modulo-4 interleaver thenthe input tuples would have modulo sequence designations 0, 1, 2, 3. Themodulo interleaving scheme, discussed here with respect to modulo-2interleavers and 2 bit tuples, may be used with any size of input tupleas well as any modulo-N interleaver. Additionally, any rate encoder 1103and any type encoder may be used with the modulo ST interleaving schemeto be described. A rate 2/3 encoder, a modulo-2 ST interleaver, and 2bit input tuples have been chosen for ease of illustration but are notintended to limit embodiments of the invention to the form disclosed. Inother words, the following modulo-2 ST interleaver is chosen along with2 bit input tuples and a rate 2/3 encoder system in order to provide fora relatively uncluttered illustration of the principles involved. The STinterleaver 1109 in this case actually can be conceptualized as twoseparate bit type interleavers 1111 and 1113. The separation of theinterleavers is done for conceptual type purposes in order to make theillustration of the concepts disclosed easier to follow. In an actualimplementation the interleaver 1109 may be implemented in a singlecircuit or multiple circuits depending on the needs of that particularimplementation. Interleaver 1111 accepts the least significant bits ofthe input tuple pairs 1101. Note input tuple pairs designate inputtuples having a pair, i.e. MSB (Most Significant Bit) and LSB (LeastSignificant Bit), of bits. The interleaver 1111 interleaves the leastsignificant bits of the input tuple pairs 1101 and provides aninterleaved sequence of least significant bits of the input tuple pairsfor example those illustrated in 1115.

In the example, only eight input tuple pairs are depicted forillustration purposes. In an actual implementation the number of tuplepairs in a block to be interleaved could number tens of thousands oreven more. Eight input tuple pairs are used for ease of illustrationpurposes. The least significant bits of the input tuple pairs 1101 areaccepted by the interleaver 1111 in the order L₀, L₁, L₂, L₃, L₄, L₅,L₆, and L₇. The interleaver, in the example of FIG. 11A, then providesan interleaved sequence 1115 in which the least significant bits of theinput tuples have been arranged in the order L₆, L₅, L₄, L₁, L₂, L₇, L₀and L₃. Note that although the least significant bit of the input tuplepairs have been shuffled by the interleaver 1111 each least significantbit in an even tuple in the input tuple pairs is interleaved to an eveninterleaved position in the output sequence 1115. In like manner, oddleast significant bits in the input sequence 1101 are interleaved byinterleaver 1111 into odd position in the output sequence 1115. This isalso a characteristic of modulo ST interleaving. That is although thedata input is interleaved, and the interleaving may be done by a varietyof different interleaving schemes know in the art, the interleavingscheme, however, is modified such that even data elements areinterleaved to even data elements and odd data elements are interleavedto odd data elements. In general, in modulo-N interleavers the datainput to an interleaver would be interleaved to output positions havingthe same modulo sequence designation as the corresponding modulosequence designation in the input sequence. That is, in a modulo-4interleaver an input data element residing in a input tuple with amodulo sequence designation of 3 would end up residing in an interleavedoutput sequence with a modulo sequence designation of 3. In other words,no matter what type of interleaving scheme the interleaver (such as1111) uses, the modulo sequence designation of each bit of the inputdata tuples sequence is maintained in the output sequence. That is,although the positions of the input sequence tuples are changed themodulo interleaved positions are maintained throughout the process. Thismodulo sequence designation, here even and odd because a modulo-2interleaver is being illustrated, will be used by the selectionmechanism to select encoded tuples corresponding to the modulo sequencedesignation of the input tuples. In other words, the modulo sequencedesignation is maintained both through the interleavers and through theencoders. Of course, since the input tuples are encoded the encodedrepresentation of the tuples appearing at the output of the encoder maybe completely different and may have more bits than the input tuplesaccepted by the encoder.

Similarly, the most significant bits of input tuples 1101 areinterleaved in interleaver 1113. In the example of FIG. 11A, thesequence M₀ through M₇ is interleaved into an output sequence M₂, M₇,M₀, M₅, M₆, M₃, M₄, and M₁. The interleaved sequence 1117, produced byinterleaving the most significant bits of the input tuples 1101 ininterleaver 1113, along with the interleaved sequence of leastsignificant bits 1115 is provided to into the “odd” rate 2/3 encoder1119. Note that in both cases all data bits are interleaved into newpositions which have the same modulo sequence designation as thecorresponding input tuples modulo sequence designation.

FIG. 11B is a second part of a combination block diagram and graphicillustration of a rate 2/3 TTCM encoder employing an ST interleaver. InFIG. 11B the even rate 2/3 encoder 1103 and the odd rate 2/3 encoder1119, as well as the tuples input to the encoders, are reproduced forclarity. Even encoder 1103 accepts the input tuple sequence 1101. Theodd encoder 1119 accepts an input sequence of tuples, which is formedfrom the interleaved sequence of most significant bits 1117 combinedwith the interleaved sequence of least significant bits 1115. Bothencoders 1103 and 1119 are illustrated as rate 2/3 nonsystematicconvolutional encoders and therefore each have a 3 bit output. Encoder1119 produces an output sequence 1153. Encoder 1103 produces an outputsequence 1151. Both sequences 1151 and 1153 are shown in script form inorder to indicate that they are encoded sequences. Both rate 2/3encoders accept 2 bit input tuples and produce 3 bit output tuples. Theencoded sequences of FIG. 11B may appear to have 2 bit elements, but infact the two letter designation and comprise 3 encoded bits each.Therefore, output tuple 1155 which is part of sequence 1153 is a 3 bittuple. The 3 bit tuple 1155 however, is designated by a script M₇ and ascript L₅ indicating that that output tuple corresponds to an inputtuple 1160, which is formed from most significant bit M₇ and leastsignificant bit L₅. In like manner, output tuple 1157 of sequence 1151comprises 3 bits. The designation of output tuple 1157 as M₀ and L₀indicates that that output tuple corresponds to the input tuple 1101,which is composed of input most significant bit M₀ and input leastsignificant bit L₀. It is worthwhile to note that output tuple ofencoder 1103, which corresponds to input tuple 1161 maintains the sameeven designation as input tuple 1161. In other words, the output tupleof an encoder in a modulo interleaving system maintains the same modulosequence designation as the input tuple to which it corresponds.Additionally, in a ST interleaver input tuple bits are interleavedindependently but are always interleaved to tuples having the samemodulo sequence designation.

Selector mechanism 1163 selects between sequences 1153 and 1151.Selector 1163 selects tuples corresponding to an even modulo sequencedesignation from the sequence 1151 and selects tuples corresponding toan odd modulo sequence designation from sequence 1153. The outputsequence created by such a selection process is shown at 1165. Thisoutput sequence is then coupled into mapper 1167. The modulo sequence1165 corresponds to encoded tuples with an even modulo sequencedesignation selected from sequence 1151 and encoded tuples with an oddmodulo sequence designation selected from 1153. The even tuples selectedare tuple M₀ L₀, tuple M₂ L₂, tuple M₄, L₄ and tuple M₄, L₄. Outputsequence also comprises output tuples corresponding to odd modulosequence designation M₇ L₅, tuple H₅ L₁, tuple M₃ L₇ and tuple M₁ andL₃.

A feature of modulo tuple interleaving systems, as well as a modulo STinterleaving systems is that encoded versions of all the input tuplebits appear in an output tuple stream. This is illustrated in outputsequence 1165, which contains encoded versions of every bit of everytuple provided in the input tuple sequence 1101.

Those skilled in the art will realize that the scheme disclosed withrespect to FIG. 11A and FIG. 11B can be easily extended to a number ofinterleavers as shown in FIG. 8A. In such a case, multiple modulointerleavers may be used. Such interleavers may be modulo tupleinterleavers in which the tuples that will be coupled to the encodersare interleaved as tuples or the interleavers may be ST interleaverswherein the input tuples are interleaved to the same modulo sequencedesignation in the output tuples but the bits are interleaved separatelyso that the output tuples of the interleavers will correspond todifferent bits than the input sequence. By interleaving tuples and bitswithin tuples a more effective interleaving may be obtained because bothbits and tuples are interleaved. Additionally, the system illustrated inFIG. 11A and FIG. 11B comprise an encoder 1103 which accepts thesequence of input tuples 1101. The configuration of FIG. 11A and 11Billustrates one embodiment. In a second embodiment the input tuples areST interleaved before being provided to either encoder. In this way boththe even and odd encoders can receive tuples which have had theircomponent bits interleaved, thus forming an interleaving which may bemore effective. In such a manner, an even encoder may produce a codewhich also benefits from IT or ST tuple interleaving. Therefore, in asecond illustrative embodiment of the invention the input tuples aremodulo interleaved before being passed to either encoder. The modulointerleaving may be a tuple interleaving, or a ST interleaving.Additionally, the types of interleaving can be mixed and matched.

Additionally, the selection of even and odd encoders is arbitrary andalthough the even encoder is shown as receiving uninterleaved tuples, itwould be equivalent to switch encoders and have the odd encoder receiveuninterleaved tuples. Additionally, as previously mentioned the tuplesprovided to both encoders may be interleaved.

FIG. 12 is a combination block diagram and graphical illustration of arate 1/2 parallel concatenated encoder (PCE) employing a modulo-Ninterleaver. FIG. 12 is provided for further illustration of the conceptof modulo interleaving. FIG. 12 is an illustration of a parallelconcatenated encoder with rate 1/2 constituent encoders 1207 and 1209.The input tuples to the encoder 1201 are provided to rate 1/2 encoder1207. Each input tuple, for example, T₀, T₁, T₂ and T_(n) given an inputtuple number corresponding to the order in which it is provided to theencoder 1207 and interleaver 1211. The input tuple number corresponds tothe subscript of the input tuple. For example, T₀ the zero tuple is thefirst tuple provided to the rate 1/2 encoder 1207, T₁ is the secondtuple provided to the rate 1/2 encoder 1207, T₂ is the third tupleprovided to the rate 1/2 input encoder 1207 and T_(n) is the N plusfirst tuple provided to the rate 1/2 encoder 1207. The input tuples maybe a single bit in which case the output of the rate 1/2 encoder 1207would comprise 2 bits. The input tuples may also comprise any number ofinput bits depending on the number of inputs to the rate 1/2 encoder1207.

The modulo concept illustrated is identical where the rate 1/2 encoderis provided with tuples having a single bit or multiple bits. The inputtuples 1201 are assigned a modulo sequence designation 1205. The modulosequence designation is formed by taking the input tuple numbermodulo-N, which is the modulo order of the interleaver. In the exampleillustrated, the modulo order of the interleaver 1211 is N. Because themodulo order of the interleaver is N the modulo sequence designation canbe any integer value between 0 and N−1. Therefore, the T₀ tuple has amodulo sequence designation of 0, the T₁ tuple has a modulo sequencedesignation of 1, the T_(n−1) input tuple has a modulo sequencedesignation of N−1, the T_(n) input tuple has a modulo sequencedesignation of 0 and the T_(n+1) input tuple has a modulo sequencedesignation of 1 and so forth. Interleaver 1211 produces interleavedtuples 1215. Similarly to the input tuples the interleaved tuples aregiven a modulo sequence designation which is the same modulo order asthe interleaver 1211. Therefore, if the input tuples have a modulosequence designation from 0 to N−1 then the interleaved tuples will havea modulo sequence designation of 0 to N−1. The interleaver 1211 caninterleave according to a number of interleaving schemes known in theart. In order to be a modulo interleaver, however, each of theinterleaving schemes must be modified so that input tuples with aparticular modulo sequence designation are interleaved to interleavedtuples with the same modulo sequence designation. The interleaved tuplesare then provided to a second rate 1/2 encoder 1209. The encoder 1207encodes the input tuples, the encoder 1209 encodes the interleavedtuples and selector 1219 selects between the output of the encoder 1207and the output of encoder 1209. It should be obvious from the foregoingdescription that modulo type interleaving can be carried out using anymodulo sequence designation up to the size of the interleaver. Amodulo-2 interleaver is typically referred to herein as an odd/eveninterleaver as the modulo sequence designation can have only the valuesof 1 or 0, i.e., odd or even respectively.

FIG. 13 is a graphic illustration of the functioning of a modulo-4 STinterleaver according to an embodiment of the invention. In theillustrated example, the modulo-4 ST interleaver 1301 interleaves ablock of 60 tuples. That is the interleaver can accommodate 60 inputtuples and perform and interleaving on them. Input tuples 24 through 35are illustrated at 1303, to demonstrate an exemplary interleaving.Interleaved tuples 0-59 are illustrated at 1305. Input tuples 24 through35 are illustrated at 1303 as 2 bit tuples. Input tuple 24 includes bitb₀₀ which is the LSB or least significant bit of input tuple 24 and b₀₁the MSB or most significant bit of input tuple 24. Similarly, inputtuple 25 includes b₀₂ which is the least significant bit (LSB) of tuple25 and b₀₃ which is the most significant bit of input tuple 25. Eachinput tuple 1303 is assigned a modulo sequence designation which isequal to the tuple number modulo-4. The modulo sequence designation oftuple 24 is 0, the modulo sequence designation of tuple 25 is 1, themodulo sequence designation of tuple 26 is 2, the modulo sequencedesignation of tuple 27 is 3, the modulo sequence designation of tuple28 is 0 and so forth. Because 1301 is a ST interleaver, the bits of eachtuple are interleaved separately. Although the bits of each tuple areinterleaved separately, they are interleaved into an interleaved tuplehaving the same modulo sequence designation, i.e. tuple number mod 4 inthe interleaved tuple as in the corresponding input tuple. Accordingly,bit b₀₀ the LSB of tuple 24 is interleaved to interleaved tuple number 4in the least significant bit position. b₀₁ the MSB of input tuple 24 isinterleaved to interleaved tuple 44 in the most significant bitposition. Note that the modulo sequence designation of input tuple 24 isa 0 and modulo sequence designation of interleaved tuple 4 andinterleaved tuple 44 are both 0. Accordingly, the criteria that bits ofan input tuple having a given modulo sequence designation areinterleaved to interleave positions having the same modulo sequencedesignation. Similarly, b₀₂ and b₀₃ of input tuple 25 are interleaved tointerleaved tuple 57 and interleaved tuple 37 respectively. B₀₄ and b₀₅of input tuple 26 are interleaved to interleaved tuples 2 and 22. Inlike manner the MSB and LSB of all illustrated input tuples 24 through35 are interleaved to corresponding interleaved tuples having the samemodulo sequence designation, as illustrated in FIG. 13.

FIG. 14A is a graphical illustration of a method for generating aninterleaving sequence from a seed interleaving sequence. Interleaversmay be implemented in random access memory (RAM). In order to interleavean input sequence, an interleaving sequence may be used. Becauseinterleavers can be quite large, it may be desirable that aninterleaving sequence occupy as little storage space within a system asfeasible. Therefore, it can be advantageous to generate largerinterleaving sequences from smaller, i.e. seed interleaving sequences.FIG. 14A is a portion of a graphical illustration in which a seedinterleaving sequence is used to generate four interleaving sequenceseach the size of the initial seed interleaving sequence. In order toillustrate the generation of sequences from the seed interleavingsequence, an interleaving matrix such as that 1401 may be employed. Theinterleaving matrix 1401 matches input positions with correspondingoutput positions. In the interleaving matrix 1401 the input positions I₀through I₅ are listed sequentially. I₀ is the first interleaving elementto enter the interleaving matrix 1401. I₁ is the second element, etc. Aswill be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the input elements I₀through I₅ may be considered to be individual bits or tuples. The inputpositions in the interleaving matrix 1401 are then matched with the seedsequence. By reading through the interleaving matrix 1401 an inputposition is matched with a corresponding output position. In theillustrative example, of the interleaving matrix 1401, input I₀ ismatched with the number 3 of the seed sequence. This means that the I₀or first element into the interleaving matrix 1401 occupies position 3in the resulting first sequence. Similarly, I₁ will be matched with a 0position in sequence 1 and so forth. In other words, the input sequenceI₀, I₁, I₂, I₃, I₄, I₅ is reordered according to the seed sequence sothat the resulting sequence output from the interleaving matrix 1401 isI₁, I₂, I₅, I₀, I₄, I₃ where the output sequence is obtained by listingthe sequence of the output in the usual ascending order I₀, I₁, I₂, I₃,I₄, I₅, where the left most position is the earliest. Put another way,the resulting sequence number 1 is {3, 4, 0, 5, 2, 1}, which correspondsto the subscript of the output sequence 1409. Similarly, in interleavingmatrix 1403 also called the inverse interleaving matrix or INTLV⁻¹ theinput sequence 1400 is accepted by the interleaving matrix 1403 butinstead of being written into this interleaving matrix sequentially, asin the case with interleaving matrix 1401, the elements are written intothe interleaving matrix according to the seed sequence. The interleavingmatrix 1403 is known as the inverse of interleaving matrix 1401 becauseby applying interleaving matrix 1401 and then successively applyinginverse interleaving matrix 1403 to any input sequence, the originalsequence is recreated. In other words, the two columns of theinterleaving matrix 1401 are swapped in order to get interleaving matrix1403. Resulting output sequence 1411 is I₃, I₀, I₁, I₅, I₄, I₂.Therefore, sequence number 2 is equal to 2, 4, 5, 1, 0, 3.

The seed interleaving sequence can also be used to create an additionaltwo sequences. The interleaving matrix 1405 is similar to interleavingmatrix 1401 except that the time reversal of the seed sequence is usedto map the corresponding output position. The output then of interleaverreverse (INTLVR 1405) is then I₄, I₃, I₀, I₅, I₁, I₂. Therefore,sequence 3 is equal to 2, 1, 5, 0, 3, 4.

Next an interleaving matrix 1407 which is similar to interleaving matrix1403 is used. Interleaving matrix 1407 has the same input positionelements as interleaving matrix 1403, however, except that the timereversal of the inverse of the seed sequence is used for thecorresponding output position within interleaving matrix 1407. In such amanner, the input sequence 1400 is reordered to I₂, I₄, I₅, I₁, I₀, I₃.Therefore, sequence number 4 is equal to 3, 0, 1, 5, 4, 2, which are, aspreviously, the subscripts of the outputs produced. Sequences 1 through4 have been generated from the seed interleaving sequence. In oneembodiment of the invention the seed interleaving sequence is an Srandom sequence as described by S. Dolinar and D. Divsalar in theirpaper “Weight Distributions for Turbo Codes Using Random and Non-RandomPermeations,” TDA progress report 42-121, JPL, August 1995.

FIG. 14B is a series of tables illustrating the construction of variousmodulo interleaving sequences from sequence 1 through 4 (as illustratedin FIG. 14A). Table 1 illustrates the first step in creating aninterleaving sequence of modulo-2, that is an even/odd interleavingsequence, from sequence I and 2 as illustrated in FIG. 14A. Sequence 1is illustrated in row 1 of table 1. Sequence 2 is illustrated in row 2of table 1. Sequence 1 and sequence 2 are then combined in row 3 oftable 1 and are labeled sequence 1-2. In sequence 1-2 elements areselected alternatively, i.e. sequentially from sequence 1 and 2 in orderto create sequence 1-2. That is element 1, which is a 1, is selectedfrom sequence 1 and placed as element 1 in sequence 1-2. The firstelement in sequence 2, which is a 3, is next selected and placed as thesecond element in sequence 1-2. The next element of sequence 1-2 isselected from sequence 1, the next element is selected from sequence 2,etc. Once sequence 1-2 has been generated, the position of each elementin sequence 1-2 is labeled. The position of elements in sequence 1-2 islabeled in row 1 of table 2. The next step in generating theinterleaving sequence, which will be sequence 5 is to multiply each ofthe elements in sequence 1-2 by the modulo of the sequence beingcreated. In this case, we are creating a modulo-2 sequence andtherefore, each of the elements in sequence 1-2 will be multiplied by 2.If a modulo-3 sequence had been created in the multiplication step, theelements would be multiplied by 3 as will be seen later. Themultiplication step is a step in which the combined sequences aremultiplied by the modulo of the interleaving sequence desired to becreated.

This methodology can be extended to any modulo desired. Once thesequence 1-2 elements have been multiplied times 2, the values areplaced in row 3 of table 2. The next step is to add to each element, nowmultiplied by modulo-N (here N equals 2) the modulo-N of the position ofthe element within the multiplied sequence i.e. the modulo sequencedesignation. Therefore, in a modulo-2 sequence (such as displayed intable 2) in the 0th position the modulo-2 value of 0 (i.e. a value of 0)is added. To position 1 the modulo-2 value of 1 (i.e. a value of 1) isadded, to position 2 the modulo-2 value of 2 (i.e. a value of 0) isadded. To position 3 the modulo-2 value of 3 is (i.e. a value of 1) isadded. This process continues for every element in the sequence beingcreated. Modulo position number as illustrated in row 4 of table 2 isthen added to the modulo multiplied number as illustrated in row 3 oftable 2. The result is sequence 5 as illustrated in row five of table 2.Similarly, in table 3, sequence 3 and sequence 4 are interspersed inorder to create sequence 3-4. In row 1 of table 4, the position of eachelement in sequence 3-4 is listed. In row 3 of table 4 each element inthe sequence is multiplied by the modulo (in this case 2) of thesequence to be created. Then a modulo of the position number is added toeach multiplied element. The result is sequence 6 which is illustratedin row 5 of table 4.

It should be noted that each component sequence in the creation of anymodulo interleaver will contain all the same elements as any othercomponent sequence in the creation of a modulo interleaver. Sequence 1and 2 have the same elements as sequence 3 and 4. Only the order of theelements in the sequence are changed. The order of elements in thecomponent sequence may be changed in any number of a variety of ways.Four sequences have been illustrated as being created through the use ofinterleaving matrix and a seed sequence, through the use of the inverseinterleaving of a seed sequence, through the use of a timed reversedinterleaving of a seed sequence and through the use of an inverse of atime interleaved reverse of a seed sequence. The creation of componentsequences are not limited to merely the methods illustrated. Multipleother methods of creating randomized and S randomized componentsequences are known in the art. As long as the component sequences havethe same elements (which are translated into addresses of theinterleaving sequence) modulo interleavers can be created from them. Themethod here described is a method for creating modulo interleavers andnot for evaluating the effectiveness of the modulo interleavers.Effectiveness of the modulo interleavers may be dependent on a varietyof factors which may be measured in a variety of ways. The subject ofthe effectiveness of interleavers is one currently of much discussion inthe art.

Table 5 is an illustration of the use of sequence 1, 2, and 3 in orderto create a modulo-3 interleaving sequence. In row 1 of table 5 sequence1 is listed. In row 2 of table 5 sequence 2 is listed and in row 3sequence 3 is listed. The elements of each of the three sequences arethen interspersed in row 4 of table 5 to create sequence 1-2-3.

In table 6 the positions of the elements in sequence 1-2-3 are labeledfrom 0 to 17. Each value in sequence 1-2-3 is then multiplied by 3,which is the modulo of the interleaving sequence to be created, and theresult is placed in row 3 of table 6. In row 4 of table 6 a modulo-3 ofeach position is listed. The modulo-3 of each position listed will thenbe added to the sequence in row 3 of table 3, which is the elements ofsequence 1-2-3 multiplied by the desired modulo, i.e. 3. Sequence 7 isthen the result of adding the sequence 1-2-3 multiplied by 3 and addingthe modulo-3 of the position of each element in sequence 1-2-3. Theresulting sequence 7 is illustrated in table 7 at row 5. As can be seen,sequence 7 is a sequence of elements in which the element in the 0position mod 3 is 0. The element in position 1 mod 3 is 1. The elementin position 2 mod 3 is 2. The element in position 3 mod 3 is 0 and soforth. This confirms the fact that sequence 7 is a modulo-3 interleavingsequence. Similarly, sequence 5 and 6 can be confirmed as modulo-2interleaving sequences by noting the fact that each element in sequence5 and sequence 6 is an alternating even and odd (i.e. modulo-2 equals 0or modulo-2 equals 1) element.

FIG. 14C is a graphical illustration of creating a modulo-4 sequencefrom four component sequences. In table 7 sequences 1, 2, 3 and 4 fromFIG. 14A are listed. The elements of sequence 1, 2, 3 and 4 are theninterspersed to form sequence 1-2-3-4.

In table 8 row 1 the positions of each element in sequence 1-2-3-4 arelisted. In row 3 of table 8 each element of sequence 1-2-3-4 ismultiplied by a 4 as it is desired to create a modulo-4 interleavingsequence. Once the elements of sequence 1-2-3-4 have been multiplied by4 as illustrated in row 3 of table 8, each element has added to it amodulo-4 of the position number, i.e. the modulo sequence designation ofthat element within the 1-2-3-4 sequence. The multiplied value ofsequence 1-2-3-4 is then added to the modulo-4 of the position insequence 8 results. Sequence 8 is listed in row 5 of table 8. To verifythat the sequence 8 generated is a modulo-4 interleaving sequence eachnumber in the sequence can be divided mod 4. When each element insequence 6 is divided modulo-4 sequence of 0, 1, 2, 3, 0, 1, 2, 3, 0, 1,2, 3 etc. results. Thus, it is confirmed that sequence 8 is a modulo-4interleaving sequence, which can be used to take an input sequence oftuples and create a modulo interleaved sequence of tuples.

FIG. 15 is a general graphical illustration of trellis-coded modulation(TCM). In FIG. 15, input tuples designated 1501 are coupled into atrellis encoder 1503. Input tuples, for illustration purposes aredesignated T₀, T₁, T₂ and T₃. Within the trellis encoder 1503 the inputtuples 1501 are accepted by a convolutional encoder 1505. The inputtuples that have been convolutionally encoded are mapped in a mapper1507. The TCM process yields a signal constellation represented as a setof amplitude phase points (or vectors) on an In phase Quadrature (I-Q)plane. An example of such vectors illustrated at 1509, 1511, 1513, and1515. The vector represented in the I-Q (In phase and Quadrature)illustration is well known in the art. The process of convolutionallyencoding and mapping when taken together is generally referred to astrellis-coded modulation. A similar process called turbo trellis-codedmodulation (TTCM) is illustrated in FIG. 16.

FIG. 16 is a graphical illustration of TTCM (Turbo Trellis CodedModulation) encoding. In FIG. 16 input tuples 1601 are provided to aparallel concatenated (turbo) encoding module 1603. The parallelconcatenated turbo encoding module 1603 may comprise a number ofencoders and intereavers. Alternatively, the parallel concatenatedencoder 1603 may comprise a minimum of two encoders and one interleaver.The output of the turbo encoder is then provided to an output selectionand puncturing module. In module 1605 outputs are selected from theconstituent encoders of the module 1603. The selection of outputs of thedifferent encoders is sometimes termed puncturing by various sources inthe art, because some of the code bits (or parity bits) may beeliminated). Selection of outputs of the constituent encoders within thepresent disclosure will be referred to herein as selecting. The termselecting is used because, in embodiments of the present invention,encoded tuples area selected from different encoders, but encoded tuplescorresponding to each of the input tuples are represented. For example,there may be an encoder designated the odd encoder from which tuplescorresponding to encoded versions of odd input tuples are selected. Theother encoder may be termed an even encoder in which the coded versionsof the even tuples are selected. This process is termed selectingbecause even though alternating encoded tuples are selected fromdifferent encoders a coded version of each input is represented. Thatis, in the selection process though some encoded symbols are discardedfrom one encoder and some encoded symbols are discarded from otherconstituent encoder(s) the selection and modulo interleaving process issuch that encoded versions of all input elements are represented. Bymodulo encoding and selecting sequentially from all encoders, encodedversions of all input bits are represented. The term puncturing as usedherein will be used to describe discarding parts or all of encodedtuples which have already been selected. The selected tuples areprovided to a mapping 1607. In embodiments of the present invention themapping may be dependent on the source of the tuple being mapped. Thatis, the mapping may be changed for example depending on whether thetuple being mapped has been encoded or not. For example, a tuple fromone of the encoders may be mapped in a first mapping. An uncoded tuplewhich has bypassed the encoder however may be mapped in a secondmapping. Combination tuples in which part of the tuple is encoded andpart of it is uncoded may also have different mappings. A combination of3 blocks—block 1603, parallel concatenated encoding, block 1605, outputselection and puncturing, and block 1607 mapping comprise what is knownas the turbo trellis-coded modulation (TTCM) encoder 1604. The output ofthe TTCM encoder is a series of constellation vectors as illustrated byexamples at 1611, 1613, 1615 and 1617.

FIG. 17 is a graphical illustration of a rate 2/3 encoder according toan embodiment of the invention. In FIG. 17, input tuples T₀ and T₁represented at 1701 are provided to odd encoder 1703. Tuple T₀ comprisesbits, b₀ and b₁ tuple T₁ comprises bits b₂ and b₃. The input tuples T₀and T₁ are also provided to an interleaver 1705. Interleaver 1705accepts input tuples (such as T₀ and T₁) and after interleaving,provides the interleaved tuples to the even encoder 1709. When oddencoder 1703 is accepting tuple T₀, comprising bits b₀ and b₁, evenencoder 1709 is accepting an interleaved tuple comprising bits i₀, andi₁. Similarly, when odd encoder 1703 is accepting tuple T₁ comprisingbits b₂ and b₃ even encoder 1709 is accepting an interleaved tuplecomprising bits i₂ and i₃. At each encoder clock (EC) both encodersaccept an input tuple. The interleaver 1705 is a modulo-2 (even/odd) STinterleaver. Each encoder accepts every input tuple. The even/odddesignation refers to which encoded tuple is selected to be accepted bythe mapper 1715. By maintaining an even/odd interleaving sequence and byselecting encoded tuples alternatively from one then the other encoder,it can be assured that an encoded version of every input tuple isselected and passed on to the mapper 1715. For example, the encodedtuple 1711, comprising bits c₃ and c₄, and c₅ and corresponding to tupleT₁ is selected and passed onto mapper 1715, which maps both even and oddselections according to map 0.

The encoded tuple c₀, c₁ and c₂, corresponding to input tuple T₀ is notselected from the odd encoder 1703. Instead, the tuple comprising bitsc′₀, c′₁, and c′₂, which corresponds to the interleaved input i₀ and i₁is selected and passed on to mapper 1715, where it is mapped using map0.

Accordingly, all the components of each tuple are encoded in the oddencoder and all components of each tuple are also encoded in the evenencoder. However, only encoded tuples corresponding to input tupleshaving an odd modulo sequence designation are selected from odd encoder1703 and passed to the mapper 1715. Similarly only encoded tuplescorresponding to input tuples having an even modulo sequence designationare selected from even encoder 1709 and passed to mapper 1715.Therefore, the odd and even designation of the encoders designate whichtuples are selected from that encoder for the purposes of being mapped.

Both encoder 1703 and 1709 in the present example of FIG. 17 areconvolutional, nonsystematic, recursive encoders according to FIG. 5.Although only encoded versions of odd tuples are selected from encoder1703, and only encoded versions of even tuples are selected from encoder1709, because both encoders have memory, each encoded output tuple notonly contains information from the tuple encoded, but also from previoustuples.

The even/odd encoder of FIG. 17 could be modified by including modulo-Ninterleaving, modulo-N interleaving could be accomplished by adding theappropriate number of both interleavers and encoders, to form a modulo-NTTCM encoder. Additionally, other configurations may be possible. Forexample, interleaver 1705 may be a ST interleaver. As an alternateanother interleaver may be added prior to odd encoder 1703. For example,if a bit interleaver, to separate the input tuple bits were added priorto encoder 1703, and interleaver 1705 were an IT interleaver, theoverall effect would be similar to specifying interleaver 1705 to be anST interleaver.

Both encoders 1703 and 1709 are rate 2/3 encoders. They are bothnonsystematic convolutional recursive encoders but are not be limited tosuch.

The overall TTCM encoder is a 2/3 encoder because both the odd encoder1703 and the even encoder 1709 accept an input tuple comprising 2 bitsand output an encoded output tuple comprising 3 bits. So even though theoutput to mapper 0 switches between even and odd encoders, both encodersare rate 2/3 and the overall rate of the TTCM encoder of FIG. 17 remainsat 2/3.

FIG. 18A is a graphical illustration of a rate 1/2 TTCM encoderimplemented using the constituent rate 2/3 base encoders, according toan embodiment of the invention. In FIG. 18A, exemplary input tuples T₀and T₁ are provided to the TTCM encoder 1800. The T₀ tuple comprises asingle bit b₀ and the T₁ tuple comprises a single bit b₁. b₀ and b₁corresponding to tuples T₀ and T₁ are provided to odd encoder 1803. Bothb₀ and b₁ are also provided to interleaver 1805. At the time when oddencoder 1803 is accepting b₀ even encoder is accepting i₀. i₀ is anoutput of the interleaver 1805. Similarly, i₁ is a output of interleaver1805 that is provided to even encoder 1809 at the same time that bit b₁is provided to odd encoder 1803. The interleaver 1805 is an odd/eveninterleaver (modulo-2). In such a manner when an odd tuple is beingprovided to odd encoder 1803, an interleaver odd tuple is being providedto even encoder 1809. When an even tuple is being provided to odd 1803,an even interleaved tuple is being provided to even encoder 1809. Inorder to achieve a rate 1/2 code from rate 2/3 constituent encoders, inaddition to an input comprising a single input bit, a constant bit valueprovided to 1811 is a second input of each of the constituent rate 2/3encoders 1803 and 1809. In FIG. 18A the input bit is shown as being a 0but could just as easily be set to a constant value of 1. Additionally,each encoder input bit might be inputted twice to the odd encoder 1803and the even encoder 1809 as illustrated in FIG. 18B. Multiple otherconfigurations are possible. For example both encoders might receiveboth input tuples as illustrated in FIG. 18C, or one of the inputs mightbe inverted as in FIG. 18E. Additionally hybrid combinations, such asillustrated in FIG. 18D are possible.

The output of odd encoder 1803, which corresponds to input tuple T₀,comprises bits c₀, c₁, c₂. The output tuple of odd encoder 1803corresponding to tuple T₁ comprises bits c₃, c₄, and c₅. At encoderclock EC₀ the even encoder 1809 has produced an encoded output tuplehaving bits c′₀, c′₁ and c′₂. One of the three encoded bits, in thepresent illustration c′₂, is punctured i.e. dropped and the remaining 2bits are then passed through to mapper 1813. During the odd encoderclock OC₁ two of three of the encoded bits provided by odd encoder 1803are selected and passed to mapper 1813. Output bit c₄ is illustrated aspunctured, that is being dropped and not being passed through the outputmapper 1813. Mapper 1813 employs map number 3 illustrated further inFIG. 24. For each encoder clock a single input tuple comprising 1 bit isaccepted into the TTCM encoder 1800. For each clock a 2-bit encodedquantity is accepted by mapper 1813. Because for each one bit providedto the encoder, 2 bits are outputted, therefore the encoder is a rate1/2 encoder. The odd and even encoders in the present embodiment arenonsystematic, convolutional, recursive encoders, but are not limited tosuch. The encoders may be any combination, for example such assystematic, block encoders. Interleaver 1805 is an odd/even interleaverand so odd output tuples are accepted by the mapper 1813 from oddencoder 1803 and even encoded tuples are accepted by the mapper 1813from even encoder 1809. In such a manner, all input tuples arerepresented in the output accepted by mapper 1813, even though some ofthe redundancy is punctured. Mapper 1813 utilizes map 3 as illustratedin FIG. 25 for use by rate 1/2 TTCM encoder 1800.

FIG. 19 is a graphical illustration of a rate 3/4 TTCM encoder, havingconstituent 2/3 rate encoders, according to an embodiment of theinvention. In FIG. 19 the input tuples T₀ and T₁, illustrated at 1901,comprise 3 bit input tuples. Input tuple T₀ comprises bits b₀, b₁ andb₂. Input tuple T₁ comprises bits b₃, b₄ and b₅. Bit b ₂ of input tupleT₀ is underlined as is b ₅ of input tuple T₁. Bits b ₂ and b ₅ areunderlined because neither of these bits will pass through eitherencoder. Instead, these bits will be concatenated to the output of theeven or odd encoder and the resulting in a 4 bit tuple provided tomapper 1911. b₀ and b₁ of input tuple T₀ are provided to odd encoder1903. At the same time that b₀ and b₁ are being accepted by the oddencoder 1903, interleaved bits i₀ and i₁ are being accepted by evenencoder 1909. Interleaver 1905 is an odd/even (module-2) typeinterleaver. The encoders illustrated at 1903 and 1909 are the encodersillustrated in FIG. 5. Encoders 1903 and 1909 are the same as theencoders illustrated at 1803 and 1809 in FIG. 18, 1703 and 1709 in FIG.17 and as will be illustrated at 2003 and 2009 in FIG. 20A and 2103 and2109 in FIG. 21A In other words, the odd encoder and even encoder arerate 2/3, nonsystematic, convolutional recursive encoders. Other typesof encoders may however be used, and types may be mixed and matched asdesired.

FIG. 17 through 21 are encoding arrangements that utilize the same basicencoder as illustrated in FIG. 5. In FIG. 19, encoders 1903 and 1909 areillustrated as separate encoders for conceptual purposes. Those skilledin the art will realize that a single encoder may be used and may betime-shared. FIG. 17 through FIG. 21 are conceptual type FIGURES and areFIGURES that represent general concepts. They depict the general conceptaccurately regardless of the particular implementation of circuitrychosen. In the rate 3/4 encoder of FIG. 19, the input tuples T₀, T₁ (andall other input tuples to the encoder of FIG. 19) comprise 3 bits. Sinceencoders 1903 and 1909 are rate 2/3 encoders with 2 input bits, thenonly 2 bits can be accommodated at a particular time. Accordingly, bit b₂ of tuple T₀ and bit b ₅ of tuples T₁ bypass the encoders completely. b₅ is concatenated to the output of odd encoder 1903, i.e. c₃, c₄ and c₅the combination of encoder tuple c₃, c₄, c₅ and b ₅ are then provided tomapper 1911 which maps the output according to map 2. Map 2 isillustrated in FIG. 24. Similarly, the output of even encoder 1909,comprising encoded bits c′₀, c′₁, and c′₂, is combined with bit b ₂ ofinput tuple T₀ and then the combination of b ₂, c′₀, c′₁, c′₂ isprovided to mapper 1911. In such a way the three bits of encoded tuplesare converted into four bits for mapping in mapper 1911. The four bitsmapped comprise the three encoded bits from either the odd or evenencoder plus a bit from the input tuple which has by passed bothencoders.

FIG. 20A is a graphical illustration of a rate 5/6 TTCM encoder, havingconstituent 2/3 rate basic encoders, according to an embodiment of theinvention. In FIG. 20A the input tuples T₀ and T₁ are illustrated at2001. Input tuple T₀ comprises five bits, b₀ through b₄. Input tuple T₁also comprises five bits, b₅ through b₉. b ₄ of tuple T₀ and b ₉ oftuple T₁ are underlined to illustrate that they do not pass througheither encoder. The odd encoder 2003 accepts b₀ and b₁ during a firstencoder clock time during which even encoder 2009 is acceptinginterleaved bits i₀ and i₁. Bits i₀ and i₁ are the outputs of theinterleaver 2005 that correspond to the same time during which inputs b₀and b₁ are accepted from the odd encoder. Similarly, the odd encoder2003 is accepting bits b₂ and b₃ at a time when the even encoder 2009 isaccepting bits i₂ and i₃. Similarly, input tuple T₁, is separated into 2bit encoder input tuples because the constituent encoders are rate 2/3encoders which accept 2 bits input and produce three encoded bits out.Because each input tuple 2001 is five bits and because each encoderallows only a 2 bit input, input tuple T₀ is separated into encodertuple b₀ and b₁ and encoder tuple b₂ and b₃. The encoder therefore, mustprocess two encoder input tuples for each input tuple 2001. Therefore, asingle input tuple 2001 will require two encoder clocks for processing.The even encoder 2009 encodes tuple i₀ and i₁ and produces correspondingoutput code bits c′₀, c′₁ and c′₂ After processing i₀ and i₁ the evenencoder 2009 processes i₂ and i₃. The output of even encoder 2009, whichcorresponds to input bits i₂ and i₃ is c′₃, c′₄ and c′₅. The odd encoder2003 processes a first tuple b₀ and b₁, and then processes a secondtuple b₂ and b₃. Tuple b₀ and b₁ are accepted by encoder 2003 whichproduces a corresponding encoded 3 bit tuple c₀, c₁ and c₂. Afteraccepting b₀ and b₁, the odd encoder 2003 accepts second tuple b₂ and b₃and produces a corresponding output c₃, c₄, and c₅. Encoder output c′₀,c′₁ and c′₂ corresponding to encoder tuple i₁ and i₀ are provided tomapper 2011. Mapper 2011 uses map 0 to map c′₀, c′₁ and c′₂.Subsequently to producing c′₀, c′₁ and c′₂ even encoder 2009 accepts i₂and i₃ and produces output c₃, c₄, and c₅. Instead of selecting c₃, c₄,c₅ to be mapped, uncoded bit b ₄ is combined with interleaved bits i₂and i₃ and selected. i₂, i₃ and b ₄ are then accepted by mapper 2011,which employs map 1 to map bits i₂, i₃ and b ₄. Therefore, with respectto the overall input tuple T₀ five bits are input into the TTCM encoder2000 and six bits are passed to mapper 2011. In other words, a codingrate of 5/6 is generated. Similarly, odd encoder 2003 encodes bits b₅and b₆ and produces coded bits c₆, c₇ and c₈. Subsequently odd encoder2003 encodes bits b₇ and b₈ and produces coded bits c₉, c₁₀ and c₁₁. c₆,c₇ and c₈ are passed to the encoder 2001 as is where they are mappedusing map 0. Encoded bit c₉, c₁₀ and c₁₁, however, are punctured, i.e.they are dropped and instead bits b₇, b₈ and b ₉ are substituted. b₇, b₈and b ₉ are passed to encoder 2011 which uses map 1 to map b₇, b₈, and b₉. A graphical illustration of map 0 can be found in FIG. 22 and agraphical illustration of Map 1 can be found in FIG. 23. In the mannerjust described, a rate 5/6 TTCM encoder is realized from two componentrate 2/3 encoders. Interleaver 2005 is similar to interleaver 1705,1805, 1905, 2005 and 2105 which also are even/odd or modulo-2 typeinterleavers. Other modulo interleavers, just as with all otherembodiments illustrated in FIG. 17 through FIG. 21, can be realized byadding additional interleavers and encoders and by selecting outputs anduncoded bits in a straight format manner similar to that illustrated inFIG. 20A.

FIG. 20B represents an alternate encoding that will yield the samecoding rate as FIG. 20A.

FIG. 21A is a graphical illustration of a rate 8/9 TTCM encoder realizedusing constituent rate 2/3 encoder, according to an embodiment of theinvention. To illustrate the functioning of TTCM rate 8/9 encoder 2100two sequential input tuples T₀ and T₁, illustrated at 2101, will beconsidered. Since the constituent encoders are rate 2/3 having two bitsas input and three bits as output, the input tuples will have to besubdivided into encoder tuples. In other words, the input tuples will bedivided into tuple pairs which can be accepted by odd encoder 2103 andeven encoder 2109. Odd encoder 2103 accepts tuple pair b₀ and b₁, pairb₂ and b₃, pair b₄ and b₅, pair b₈ and b₉, pair b₁₀ and b₁₁, and pairb₁₂ and b₁₃ sequentially, since the basic 2/3 rate encoder can onlyaccept one pair of input bits at a time. Even encoder correspondinglyaccepts input pairs i₀ and i₁, input pair i₂ and i₃, input pair i₄ andi₅, input pair i₈ and i₉, input pair i₁₀ and i₁₁, and input pair i₁₂ andi₁₃ sequentially. The pairs accepted by the even encoder correspond totuple pairs having the same numbering accepted by the odd encoder at thesame time. That is i₀ and i₁ are accepted by the even encoder 2109during the same time period as input pair b₀ and b₁ is accepted by theodd encoder 2103. Odd and even encoders then produce encoded outputsfrom the input pairs accepted. Even encoder 2909 produces a firstencoded output triplet c′₀, c′₁ and c′₂ followed by a second outputtriplet c′₃, c′₄ and c′₅ followed by a third output triplet C′₆, c′₇ andc′₈ (a triplet is a 3 bit tuple). The first output triplet c′₀, c′₁ andc′₂ is accepted by the mapper 2111. The mapper 2111 utilizes map 0 tomap encoded output c′₀, c′₁ and c′₂. Encoded output bits c′₃, c′₄ andc′₅ however are punctured, that is not sent to the mapper. Instead ofsending c′₃, c′₄ and c′₅ to the mapper 2111 the triplet of bitscomprising i₂, i₃ and b ₆ are sent to the mapper 2111. The mapper 2111utilizes map 1 as the mapping for the triplet i₂, i₃, b ₆. Encodedtriplet c′₆, c′₇ and c′₈ is also punctured. That is, it is not sent tothe mapper 2111. Instead, i₄, i₅ and b ₇ is sent to the mapper 2111which uses map 1 to map input triplet i₄, i₅ and b ₇. Because eight bitscorresponding to tuple T₀ are accepted by the even encoder 2109 and ninebits are output into the mapper 2111 the overall encoder 2100 is a rate8/9 encoder. Similarly, input tuple T₁ is encoded by the odd encoder2103. The output triplet from the odd encoder c₉, c₁₀ and c₁₁corresponds to input tuple b₈ and b₉. Next, odd encoder 2103 produces anencoded output triplet c₁₂, c₁₃ and c₁₄, which is an output tripletcorresponding to input pair b₁₀ and b₁₁. Subsequently odd encoder 2103produces output triplet c₁₅, c₁₆ and c₁₇. Output triplet c₁₅, c₁₆ andc₁₇ corresponds to input pair b₁₂ and b₁₃. Output triplet c₉, c₁₀ andc₁₁ are sent to the mapper 2111 which uses map 0 to map output tripletc₉, c₁₀ and c₁₁. Output triplet c₁₂, c₁₃ and c₁₄ however is puncturedand in its place b₁₀, b₁₁ and b ₁₄ is sent to mapper 2111 where map 1 isemployed to map the input triplet b₁₀, b₁₁ and b ₁₄. The encoder tripletc₁₅, c₁₆ and c₁₇ is also punctured and a triplet comprising b₁₂, b₁₃ andb ₁₅ is provided to mapper 2111. Map 1 is used to map the input tripletb₁₂, b₁₃ and b ₁₅. In the manner just described an 8/9 encoder isfabricated from two constituent rate 2/3 encoder.

From the foregoing TTCM encoder examples of FIG. 17 through FIG. 21 itis seen that the basic rate 2/3 encoders can be used in a variety ofconfigurations to produce a variety of coding rates.

The basic constituent encoders illustrated in FIG. 17 through FIG. 21are rate 2/3, nonsystematic, convolutional recursive encoders. Theseillustrations represent a few examples. Different types of encoders andeven different rates of encoders may yield many other similar examples.Additionally, encoder types can be mixed and matched; for example, arecursive nonsystematic convolution encoder may be used with anonrecursive systematic block encoder.

Additionally, the interleavers illustrated in FIG. 17 through FIG. 21are modulo-2 (even/odd) ST interleavers. Those skilled in the art willrealize that IT type interleavers may be used alternatively in theembodiments of the invention illustrated in FIG. 17 through FIG. 21.

Additionally the TTCM encoders illustrated in FIG. 17 through FIG. 21may employ modulo-N encoding systems instead of the modulo-2 (even/odd)encoding systems illustrated. For example, each of the constituentencoder—modulo-2 interleaver subsystems may be replaced by modulo-Nsubsystems such as illustrated in FIG. 8A. By maintaining the same typepuncturing and selecting with each encoder as displayed with theeven/odd encoders of FIG. 17 through FIG. 21 and extending it tomodulo-N systems, such as illustrated in FIG. 8A, the same coding ratescan be maintained in a modulo-N system for any desired value N.

FIG. 21B represents an alternate encoding that will yield the samecoding rate as FIG. 21A.

FIG. 22 is a graphical illustration of map 0 according to an embodimentof the invention. Map 0 is used in the implementation of the rate 2/3encoder as illustrated in FIG. 17. Map 0 is also utilized in rate 5/6encoder illustrating in FIG. 20A and rate 8/9 encoder illustrated inFIG. 21A.

FIG. 23 is a graphical illustration of map 1 according to an embodimentof the invention. Map 1 is used by the mapper in the rate 5/6 encoder inFIG. 20A, and in the mapper in the rate 8/9 encoder in FIG. 21A.

FIG. 24 is a graphical illustration of map 2 according to an embodimentof the invention. Map 2 is utilized in the fabrication of the rate 3/4encoder as illustrated in FIG. 19.

FIG. 25 is a graphical illustration of map 3 according to an embodimentof the invention. Map 3 is used in the rate 1/2 encoder as depicted inFIG. 18.

Maps 0 through 3 are chosen through a process different from thetraditional approach of performing an Ungerboeck mapping (as given inthe classic work “Channel Coding with Multilevel/Phase Signals” byGottfried Ungerboeck, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory Vol. 28No. 1 January 1982). In contrast in embodiments of the presentinvention, the approach used to develop the mappings was to select nonUngerboeck mappings, then to measure the distance between the code wordsof the mapping. Mappings with the greatest average effective distanceare selected. Finally the mappings with the greatest average effectivedistance are simulated and those with the best performance are selected.Average effective distance is as described by S. Dolinar and D. Divsalarin their paper “Weight Distributions for Turbo Codes Using Random andNon-Random Permeations,” TDA progress report 42-121, JPL, August 1995.

FIG. 26 is a TTCM decoder according to an embodiment of the invention.FIG. 26 illustrates a block diagram of the TTCM decoder corresponding tothe TTCM encoder described above. The TTCM decoder includes a circularbuffer 2602, a metric calculator module 2604, two soft-in soft-out(SISO) modules 2606, 2608, two interleavers 2610, 2612, a conditionalpoints processing module 2614, a first-in first-out (FIFO) register2616, and an output processor 2618.

The TTCM decoder of FIG. 26 implements a MAP (Maximum A Posteriori)probability decoding algorithm.

The MAP Algorithm is used to determine the likelihood of the possibleparticular information bits transmitted at a particular bit time.

Turbo decoders, in general, may employ a SOVA (Soft Output ViterbiAlgorithm) for decoding. SOVA is derived from the classical ViterbiDecoding Algorithm (VDA). The classical VDA takes soft inputs andproduces hard outputs a sequence of ones and zeros. The hard outputs areestimates of values, of a sequence of information bits. In general, theSOVA Algorithm takes the hard outputs of the classical VDA and producesweightings that represent the reliability of the hard outputs.

The MAP Algorithm, implemented in the TTCM decoder of FIG. 26, does notproduce an intermediate hard output representing the estimated values ofa sequence of transmitted information bits. The MAP Algorithm receivessoft inputs and produces soft outputs directly.

The input to the circular buffer i.e. input queue 2602 is a sequence ofreceived tuples. In the embodiments of the invention illustrated in FIG.26, each of the tuples is in the form of 8-bit in-phase (I) and 8-bitquadrature (Q) signal sample where each sample represents a receivedsignal point or vector in the I-Q plane. The circular buffer 2602outputs one tuple at a time to the metric calculator 2604.

The metric calculator 2604 receives I and Q (In-phase, Quadrature)values from the circular buffer 2602 and computes corresponding metricsrepresenting distances form each of the 8 members of the signalconstellation (using a designated MAP) to the received signal sample.The metric calculator 2604 then provides all eight distance metrics(soft inputs) to the SISO modules 2606 and 2608. The distance metric ofa received sample point from each of the constellation points representsthe log likelihood probability that the received sample corresponds to aparticular constellation point. For rate 2/3, there are 8 metricscorresponding to the points in the constellation of whatever map is usedto encode the data. In this case, the 8 metrics are equivalent to theEuclidean square distances between the value received and each of theconstellation whatever map is used to encode the data.

SISO modules 2606 and 2608 are MAP type decoders that receive metricsfrom the metric calculator 2604. The SISOs then perform computations onthe metrics and pass the resulting A Posteriori Probability (APOP)values or functions thereof (soft values) to the output processor 2618.

The decoding process is done in iterations. The SISO module 2606 decodesthe soft values which are metrics of the received values of the firstconstituent code corresponding to the constituent encoder for example1703 (FIG. 17). The SISO module 2608 decodes the soft values which arethe APoP metrics of the received values of the second constituent codecorresponding to the constituent encoder for example 1709 (FIG. 17). TheSISO modules simultaneously process both codes in parallel. Each of theSISO modules computes the metrics corresponding to the input bits forevery bit position of the in the block of 10K tuples (representing aexemplary block of date), and for each of the trellis states that thecorresponding encoder could have been in.

One feature of the TTCM decoder is that, during each iteration, the twoSISO modules 2606, 2608 are operating in parallel. At the conclusion ofeach iteration, output from each SISO module is passed through acorresponding interleaver and the output of the interleaver is providedas updated or refined A Priori Probability (APrP) information to theinput of other cross coupled SISO modules for the next iteration.

After the first iteration, the SISO modules 2706, 2708 produce softoutputs to the interleaver 2610 and inverse interleaver 2612,respectively. The interleaver 2610 (respectively, inverse interleaver2612) interleaves the output from the SISO module 2606 (respectively,2608) and provides the resulting value to the SISO module 2608(respectively, 2606) as a priori information for the next iteration.Each of the SISO modules use both the metrics from the metric calculator2604 and the updated APrP metric information from the other crosscoupled SISO to produce a further SISO Iteration. In the presentembodiment of the invention, the TTCM decoder uses 8 iterations in itsdecoding cycle. The number of iterations can be adjusted in firmware orcan be changed depending on the decoding process.

Because the component decoders SISO 2606 and 2608 operate in parallel,and because the SISO decoders are cross coupled, no additional decodersneed to be used regardless of the number of iterations made. Theparallel cross coupled decoders can perform any number of decodingcycles using the same parallel cross coupled SISO units (e.g. 2606 and2608).

At the end of the 8 iterations the iteratively processed APoP metricsare passed to the output processor 2618. For code rate 2/3, the outputprocessor 2618 uses the APoP metrics output from the interleaver 2610and the inverse interleaver 2612 to determine the 2 information bits ofthe transmitted tuple. For code rate 5/6 or 8/9, the output from theFIFO 2616, which is the delayed output of the conditional pointsprocessing module 2614, is additionally needed by the output processor2618 to determine the uncoded bit, if one is present.

For rate 2/3, the conditional points processing module 2614 is notneeded because there is no uncoded bit. For rate 5/6 or 8/9, theconditional points processing module 2614 determines which points of thereceived constellation represent the uncoded bits. The output processor2618 uses the output of the SISOs and the output of the conditionalpoints processor 2614 to determine the value of the uncoded bit(s) thatwas sent by the turbo-trellis encoder. Such methodology of determiningthe value of an uncoded bit(s) is well known in the art as applied totrellis coding.

FIG. 27 is a TTCM modulo-4 decoder according to an embodiment of theinvention. The modulo four decoder of FIG. 27 is similar to the modulo-2decoder illustration in FIG. 26. The functions of the input queue 2802,metric calculator 2804, conditional points processor 2814, and first infirst out (FIFO) 2816 are similar to their counterparts in FIG. 26. Thesignals that will be decoded by the TTCM modulo-4 decoder FIG. 27 is onethat has been coded in a modulo-4 interleaving system. Therefore,instead of having merely even and odd SISOs and interleavers, SISO 0, 1,2 and 3 are used as are interleaver 0, 1, 2 and 3. Because the data hasbeen encoded using a modulo-4 interleaving system, SISOs 0, 1, 2 and 3can operate in parallel using interleaver 0, 1, 2 and 3. Once the SISOs0 through 3 have processed through the points corresponding to themetrics of the points received in the input queue, the points can thenbe passed on to output process 2818. Output process 2818 will thenprovide decoded tuples.

FIG. 28 is a graphical illustration of a modulo-N and encoding anddecoding system according to an embodiment of the invention. In FIG. 28,the encoder 2800 is a modulo-N encoder. The modulo-N encoder illustratedhas N encoders and N−1 interleavers. The selector, 2801 selects encodedtuples sequentially from the output of encoders 0 through N. Selector2801 then passes the selection onto the mapper which applies theappropriate mapping. The appropriately mapped data is then communicatedover a channel 2803 to an input queue 2805. The functions of input 2805,metric calculator 2807, conditional points processor 2809 and FIFO 2811are similar to those illustrated in FIG. 26 and 2478. The decoder 2813has N SISOs corresponding to the N encoders. Any desired amount ofparallelism can be selected for the encoder decoder system with the onecaveat that the modulo-N decoding must match the modulo-N encoding. Byincreasing the modulo of the system, more points which have beenproduced by the metric calculator 2807 can be processed at the sametime.

SISOs 0 through N process the points provided by the metric calculatorin parallel. The output of one SISO provides A Priori values for thenext SISO. For example SISO 0 will provide an A Priori value for SISO 1,SISO 1 will provide an A Priori value for SISO 2, etc. This is madepossible because SISO 0 implements a Map decoding algorithm andprocesses points that have a modulo sequence position of 0 within theblock of data being processed, SISO 1 implements a Map decodingalgorithm and processes points that have a modulo sequence position of 1within the block of data being processed, and so forth. By matching themodulo of the encoding system to the modulo of the decoding system thedecoding of the data transmitted can be done in parallel. The amount ofparallel processing available is limited only by the size of the datablock being processed and the modulo of the encoding and decoding systemthat can be implemented.

FIG. 29 is a graphical illustration of the output of the TTCM encoderillustrated in FIG. 17. FIG. 29 retains the same convention that Cstands for a coded bit. The output of the TTCM encoder of FIG. 17 isrepresented by the sequences 2901 and 2903. The tuple sequence 2901represents the actual output of rate 2/3rds encoder illustrated in FIG.17. During a first time period T₀, bits C₀, C₁ are output from theencoder. The source of bits C₀, C₁ and C₂ represent 3 bits encoded bythe even encoder 1709. These first 3 bits are mapped according tomapping sequence 2903. According to mapping sequence 2903 bits C₀, C₁and C₂ are mapped using map 0 as illustrated in FIG. 22. Together thetuple sequence and mapping identify the type of output of the rate2/3rds encoder illustrated in FIG. 17.

The tuple C₃, C₄ and C₅ is provided by the encoder of FIG. 17immediately after the tuple comprising C₀, C₁ and C₂. The tuple C₃, C₄and C₅ is been encoded in the odd encoder. The tuple sequence 2901corresponding to time T₁ is the result of an encoding performed in theodd encoder 1703.

In FIG. 29 through and including FIG. 33 the following conventions areadopted. Even encoder outputs will be shaded a light gray. The oddencoder outputs have no shading. In such a way the tuple sequence whichcomprises the output of the corresponding TTCM encoder can beidentified. The gray shading denotes that the tuple was encoded in theeven constituent encoder, and the lack of shading indicates that thetuple was encoded in the odd convolutional constituent encoder.Additionally uncoded bits that are associated with the even encoder datastream are shaded.

A letter C will represent a coded bit which is sent and an underlinedletter B will represent unencoded (or simply “uncoded”) bits which havenot passed through either constituent encoder and a B without theunderline will represent a bit which is encoded, but transmitted inunencoded form.

In time sequence T₂ the TTCM output is taken from the even encoder,accordingly the bit C₆, C₇ and C₈ appear as a gray shaded tuple sequenceindicating that they were encoded by the even encoder. At time T3 outputtuple sequence 2901 comprises C₉, C₁₀ and C₁₁ which had been encoded bythe odd encoder. All members of the tuple sequence for the rate 2/3rdsencoder illustrated in FIG. 17 are mapped using map 0 as shown atmapping sequence 2903. The characterization of TTCM encoders outputtuples using tuple sequence and mapping sequence will be used later whenconsidering the decoding. For the present it is only necessary torealize that the combination of the tuple sequence and mapping sequencecorrespond to its type. The tuple type completely specifies the outputof the TTCM encoder for the purposes of decoding.

FIG. 30 is a graphical illustration of the tuple types produced by theTTCM encoder illustrated in FIG. 18A. The TTCM encoder illustrated inFIG. 18A is a rate 1/2 encoder. The rate 1/2 encoder illustrated in FIG.18A produces output tuples comprising 2 bits. The first tuple pair C₀and C₁, corresponding to output time T₀, is produced by the even encoder1809 as indicated by the shading of the tuple. The next tuplecorresponding to output time T₁ comprises coded bits C₂ and C₃ whichhave been encoded by the odd encoder 1809. Similarly, the tuplecorresponding to time T₂ is produced by the even encoder and the tuplecorresponding to time T₃ is produced by the odd encoder. All tuplesequences 3001 are mapped using to map 0 as shown by the mappingsequence 3003. The combination of tuple sequence 3001 and mappingsequence 3003 comprise the type of the tuple produced by the rate 1/2TTCM encoder of FIG. 18A. The type of tuples produced by the TTCMencoder of FIG. 18A will be useful for the purposes of decoding theoutput tuples.

FIG. 31 is a graphical illustration illustrating the tuple typesproduced by the rate 3/4 encoder of FIG. 19. The tuple sequence 3101,representing the output of the TTCM encoder of FIG. 19 is a sequence of4 bit tuples. The output tuple corresponding to time T₀ is 4 bits. C₀,C₁, C₂ and unencoded bit B₀. Tuple sequence corresponding to time T₀ ismapped by map 2 as shown by mapping sequence 3103. Additionally, thetuple sequence 3101 during time T₀ is mapped by the even encoder, asillustrated by the shading. In other words, the uncoded bit B ₀ does notpass through either the even or odd encoder. It is however shown shadedas the tuple sequence, to which it is paired, is produced by the evenencoder 1909.

Similarly, the tuple sequence corresponding to T₂ has been produced bythe even encoder. The tuple sequence corresponding to time T₂, i.e. C₆,C₇ and C₈, are produced by even encoder 1909 and paired with unencodedbit B ₂. C₆, C₇ and C₈ are produced by the even encoder. Combination C₆,C₇, C₈ and B ₂ are mapped according to map 2 as illustrated in FIG. 24.

Similarly, the tuple sequences produced by the TTCM encoder of FIG. 19during times T₁ and T₃ are produced by the odd encoder and combined withan uncoded bit. During time T₁ the odd encoder encodes C₃, C₄ and C₅.C₃, C₄ and C₅ along with B₁, are mapped in map 2. The tuple sequenceproduced during time T₃ is also a combination of the odd encoder and anencoded bit. As illustrated in FIG. 31 all tuple sequences are mappedusing map 2.

FIG. 32 is a graphical illustration of the tuple types produced by therate 5/6 encoder illustrated in FIG. 20A. The first tuple correspondingto time T₀ comprises coded bits C₀, C₁ and C₂. The coded bits C₀, C₁ andC₂ are mapped according to map 0. During time T₁, bits B₀, B₁ and B ₂are produced by the encoder of FIG. 20A. B₀, B₁ and B ₂ represent datathat is sent uncoded they are however shown as being grayed out becausebits B₁ and B₀ pass through the even encoder even though they are sentin uncoded form. The uncoded bits B₀, B₁ and B ₂ are mapped using map 1.Similarly, the output of the encoder at time T₄ comprises coded bits C₆,C₇ and C₈ which are mapped using map 0. During time period T₅ uncodedbits B₆, B₇ and B ₈ form the output of the encoder. B₆, B₇ and B ₈ aremapped using map 1.

During time period T₂, bits C₃, C₄ and C₅ are selected from the oddencoder as the output of the overall 5/6 encoder illustrated in FIG.20A. Bits C₃, C₄ and C₅ are mapped in mapper 0 and form the turbotrellis coded modulated output. Similarly, during time T₆, bit C₉, C₁₀and C₁₁ are selected from the odd encoder and mapped according to map 0.During time period T₇, uncoded bits B₉, B₁₀ and B₁₁ are selected as theoutput of the rate 5/6 encoder and are mapped according to map 1. Thechart of FIG. 32 defines the types of output produced by the rate 5/6encoder of FIG. 20A.

FIG. 33 is a chart defining the types of outputs produced by the 8/9thencoder illustrated in FIG. 21A. All uncoded outputs are mappedaccording to map 1. All coded outputs are mapped according to map 0.During times T₀ and T₆ coded outputs from the even encoder are selected.During times T₃ and T₉ coded output from the odd encoder are selected.Accordingly, the tuple types produced by the rate 8/9ths encoder of FIG.21 are completely described by the illustration of FIG. 33.

FIG. 34 is a further graphical illustration of a portion of the decoderillustrated in FIG. 26. In FIG. 34 the circular buffer 2602 is furtherillustrated as being a pair of buffers 3407 and 3409. Switches 3401,3403, 3405 and 3408 operate in such a fashion as to enable the metriccalculator 3411 to receive data from one buffer while the other bufferis accepting data. In such a fashion one buffer can be used forprocessing input data by providing it to the metric calculator and thesecond buffer can be used for receiving data. The metric calculator 3411receives data, as required, from either buffer 3407 or buffer 3409 andcalculates the distance between the received point and designated pointsof the data constellation produced by the source encoder. The symbolsequencer 3413 provides data to the metric calculator 3411 specifyingthe type of tuple, i.e. the constellation and bit encoding of the tuple,which is being decoded. The symbol sequencer also provides informationto either buffer 3407 and 3409 regarding which data bits are to beprovided to the metric calculator 3411. The symbol sequencer isgenerally provided information, regarding the symbol types to bereceived, during the initialization of the system. Symbol typing hasbeen discussed previously with respect to FIG. 29 through FIG. 33. Themetric calculator 3411 calculates the metrics for each received point.The metrics for a particular receive point will typically comprise 8Euclidean distance squared values for each point as indicated at theoutput of metric calculator 3411. The Euclidean distance of a point isillustrated in FIG. 35.

The metric calculator 3411 of FIG. 34 has two outputs 3415 and 3417. Theoutput 3415 represents eight metrics each of six bits corresponding tothe Euclidian distance squared in the I-Q plane between a received pointand all eight possible points of the signal constellation whichrepresent valid received data points. Output 3417 represents the mappingof an encoded bit, if any is present. The output 3417 is an indicator ofhow to select the value of an uncoded bit. The value of the eightoutputs at 3417 correspond to a 0 or 1 indicating whether the receivepoint is closer to an actual point in which the uncoded bit would assumea value of 0 or 1. The method of including uncoded bits within aconstellation has been well known in the art and practiced in connectionwith trellis coded modulation. It is included here for the sake ofcompleteness. The uncoded bit metrics will be stored in FIFO 2616 untilthe corresponding points are decoded in the output processor 2618. Oncethe corresponding points are decoded in the output processor 2618, theycan be matched with the proper value for the uncoded bit as applied byFIFO 2616.

FIG. 35 is a graphical illustration of the process carried on within themetric calculator of the decoder. In FIG. 35, a constellation ofdesignated points is represented in the I-Q plain by points 3503, 3505,3507, 3509, 3511, 3513, 3515 and 3517. The points just mentionedconstitute an exemplary constellation of transmitted point values. Inactual practice a received point may not match any of the designatedtransmission points of the transmitted constellation. Further a receivedpoint matching one of the points in the constellation illustrated maynot coincide with the point that had actually been transmitted at thetransmitter. A received point 3501 is illustrated for exemplary purposesin calculating Euclidean squared distances. Additionally, point 3519 isillustrated at the 00 point of the I-Q plain. Point 3519 is a pointrepresenting a received point having an equal probability of being anypoint in the transmitted constellation. In other words, point 3519 is apoint having an equal likelihood of having been transmitted as anyconstellation point. Point 3519 will be used in order to provide aneutral value needed by the decoder for values not transmitted.

The metric calculator 3411 calculates the distance between a receivepoint, for example 3501, and all transmitted points in theconstellation, for example, points 3503 and 3505. The metric calculatorreceives the coordinates for the receive points 3501 in terms of 8 bitsI and 8 bits Q value from which it may calculate Euclidean distancesquared between the receive point and any constellation point. Forexample, if receive point 3501 is accepted by the metric calculator 3411it will calculate value X(0) and Y(0), which are the displacement in theX direction and Y direction of the receive point 3501 from theconstellation pointer 3503. The values for X(0) and Y(0) can then besquared and summed and represent D²(0). The actual distance between areceive point 3501 and a point in the constellation, for example 3503can then be computed from the value for D²(0). The metric calculatorhowever, dispenses with the calculation of the actual value of D(0) andinstead employs the value D²(0) in order to save the calculation timethat would be necessary to compute D(0) from D²(0). In like manner themetric calculator then computes the distance between the receive pointand each of the individual possible points in the constellation i.e.3503 through 3517.

FIG. 36 is a graphical illustration of the calculation of a Euclideansquared distance metric. Once the metric values representing the 8metrics have been calculated, the metric calculator 2604 can thenprovide them to the SISOs 2606 and 2608.

SISOs 2606 and 2608 of FIG. 34 accept the values from the metriccalculator 3411. SISO 2606 decodes points corresponding to the oddencoder an SISO 2608 decodes point corresponding to the even encoder.SISOs 2606 and 2608 operate according to a map decoding algorithm.Within each SISO is a trellis comprising a succession of statesrepresenting all of the states of the odd or even encoder. The valuesassociated with each state represent that probability that the encoderwas in that particular state during the time period associated with thatparticular state. Accordingly, SISO 2606 decodes the odd encoder trellisand SISO 2608 decodes the even encoder trellis. Because only the oddpoints are accepted for transmission from the odd encoder SISO 2606 maycontain only points corresponding to odd sequence designations and SISO2608 contains only points corresponding to even sequence designations.These are the only values supplied by the metric calculator becausethese are the only values selected for transmission. Accordingly, inconstructing the encoder trellis for both the odd encoder within SISO2606 and the even encoder within SISO 2608 every other value is absent.Because a trellis can only represent a sequence of values, every otherpoint, which is not supplied to each SISO must be fabricated in somemanner. Because every other point in each of the two SISOs is an unknownpoint, there is no reason to presume that one constellation point ismore likely than any other constellation point.

Accordingly, the points not received by the SISOs from the metriccalculator are accorded the value of the 0 point 3519. The 00 point 3519is chosen because it is equidistant, i.e. equally likely, from all thepossible points in the encoded constellation.

FIG. 37 is a representation of a portion of a trellis diagram as may bepresent in either SISO 2606 or SISO 2608. The diagram illustrates acalculation of the likelihood of being in state M 3701. The likelihoodof being in state M, 3701 is calculated in two different ways. Thelikelihood of being in state M 3701 at time k is proportional to thelikelihood that a time K−1 that the encoder was in a state in which thenext successive state could be state M (times the likelihood that thetransmission was made into state M). In the trellis diagram state M maybe entered from precursor states 3703, 3705, 3707 or 3709. Therefore,the likelihood of being in state M 3701 is equal to the likelihood ofbeing in state 3701, which state 0 of the encoder, and is symbolized byα_(k)(0).

The likelihood of being in state M 3701 may be evaluated using previousand future states. For example, if state M 3701 is such that it may beentered only from states 3703, 3705, 3707 or 3709, then the likelihoodof being in state M 3701 is equal to the summation of the likelihoodsthat it was in state 3703 and made a transition to state 3701, plus thelikelihood that the decoder was in state 3705 and made the transition tostate 3701, plus the likelihood that the decoder was in state 3707 andmade the transition to state 3701, plus the likelihood that the decoderwas in state 3709 and made the transition to state 3701.

The likelihood of being in state M 3701 at time k may also be analyzedfrom the viewpoint of time k+1. That is, if state M 3701 can transitionto state 3711, state 3713, state 3715, or state 3717, then thelikelihood that the decoder was in state M 3701 at time k is equal to asum of likelihoods. That sum of likelihoods is equal to the likelihoodthat the decoder is in state 3711 at time k+1 and made the transitionfrom state 3701, plus the likelihood that the decoder is in state 3713at time k+1, times the likelihood that it made the transition from stateM 3701, plus the likelihood that it is in state 3715 and made thetransition from state 3701, plus the likelihood that it is in state 3717and made the transition from state M 3701. In other words, thelikelihood of being in a state M is equal to the sum of likelihoods thatthe decoder was in a state that could transition into state M, times theprobability that it made the transition from the precursor state tostate M, summed over all possible precursor states.

The likelihood of being in state M can also be evaluated from apost-cursor state. That is, looking backwards in time. T₀ look backwardsin time, the likelihood that the decoder was in state M at time k isequal to the likelihood that it was in a post-cursor state at time k+1times the transition probability that the decoder made the transitionfrom state M to the post-cursor state, summed over all the possiblepost-cursor states. In this way, the likelihood of being in a decoderstate is commonly evaluated both from a past and future state. Althoughit may seem counter-intuitive that a present state can be evaluated froma future state, the problem is really semantic only. The decoder decodesa block of data in which each state, with the exception of the firsttime period in the block of data and the last time period in the blockof data, has a precursor state and a post-cursor state represented. Thatis, the SISO contains a block of data in which all possible encoderstates are represented over TP time periods, where TP is generally thelength of the decoder block. The ability to approach the probability ofbeing in a particular state by proceeding in both directions within theblock of data is commonly a characteristic of map decoding.

The exemplary trellis depicted in FIG. 37 is an eight state trellisrepresenting the eight possible encoder states. Additionally, there area maximum of four paths into or out of any state, because theconstituent encoders which created the trellis in FIG. 37 had 2-bitinputs. Such a constituent encoder is illustrated in FIG. 5. In fact,FIG. 37 is merely an abbreviated version of the trellis of the righttwo-thirds constituent encoder illustrated in FIG. 6, with an additionaltime period added.

The state likelihoods, when evaluating likelihoods in the forwarddirection, are termed the “forward state metric” and are represented bythe Greek letter alpha (α). The state likelihoods, when evaluating thelikelihood of being in a particular state when evaluated in the reversedirection, are given the designation of the Greek letter beta (β). Inother words, forward state metric is generally referred to as α, and thereverse state metric is generally referred to as β.

FIG. 38 is a generalized illustration of a forward state metric alpha(α) and a reverse state metric beta (β). The likelihood of being instate 3801 at time k is designated as α_(k). α_(k) designates theforward state metric alpha at time k for a given state. Therefore, α_(k)for state 3801 is the likelihood that the encoder was in a trellis stateequivalent to state 3801 at time k. Similarly, at time k−1, thelikelihood that the encoder was in a state equivalent to state 3803 attime α_(k−)1 is designated as α_(k−1) (3803). The likelihood that theencoder was in state 3805 at time k−1 is equal to α_(k−1) (3805).Similarly, at time k−1, the likelihood that the encoder was in state3807 at time k−1 is equal to α_(k−1) (3807). Similarly, the likelihoodthat the encoder was in a state equivalent to state 3809 at time k−1 isequal to α_(k−1) (3809). Therefore, to compute the likelihood that theencoder is in state 3801, the likelihood of being in a precursor statemust be multiplied by the likelihood of making the transition from aprecursor state into state 3801.

The input at the encoder that causes a transition from a state 3803 to3801 is an input of 0,0. The likelihood of transition between state 3803and state 3801 is designated as δ(0,0) (i.e. delta (0,0)). Similarly,the transition from state 3805 to 3801 represents an input of 0,1, thelikelihood of transition between state 3805 and state 3801 isrepresented by δ(0,1). Similarly, the likelihood of transition betweenstate 3807 and 3801 is represented by δ(1,0) as a 1,0 must be receivedby the encoder in state 3807 to make the transition to state 3801.Similarly, a transition from state 3809 to state 3801 can beaccomplished upon the encoder receiving a 1,1, and therefore thetransition between state 3809 and state 3801 is the likelihood of thattransition, i.e. δ(1,1). Accordingly, the transition from state 3803 to3801 is labeled δ₁(0,0) indicating that this is a first transitionprobability and it is the transition probability represented by an inputof 0,0. Similarly, the transition likelihood between state 3805 and 3801is represented by δ₂(0,1), the transition between state 3807 and state3801 is represented by δ₃(1,0), and the likelihood of transition betweenstate 3809 and 3801 is represented by δ₄(1,1).

The situation is similar in the case of the reverse state metric, beta(β). The likelihood of being in state 3811 at time k+1 is designatedβ_(k+1) (3811). Similarly, the likelihood of being in reverse metricstates 3813, 3815, and 3817 are equal to β_(k+1) (3813), β_(k+1) (3815),and β_(k) (3817). Likewise, the probability of transition between state3811 and 3801 is equal to δ₁(0,0), the likelihood of transition betweenstate 3813 and 3801 is equal to δ₅ (0,1). The likelihood of transitionfrom state 3815 to 3801 is equal to δ₆(1,0), and the likelihood oftransition between state 3815 and 3801 is equal to δ₇(1,1). In theexemplary illustration of FIG. 38, there are four ways of transitioninginto or out of a state. The transitions are determined by the inputs tothe encoder responsible for those transitions. In other words, theencoder must receive a minimum of two bits to decide between fourdifferent possible transitions. By evaluating transitions between statesin terms of 2-bit inputs to the encoder at a given time, somewhat betterperformance can be realized than by evaluating the decoding in terms ofa single bit at a time. This result may seem counter-intuitive, as itmight be thought that evaluating a trellis in terms of a single bit, orin terms of multiple bits, would be equivalent. However, by evaluatingthe transitions in terms of how the input is provided at a given time, asomewhat better performance is obtained because the decoding inherentlymakes use of the noise correlation which exists between two, or more,simultaneous input bits.

Accordingly, the likelihood of being in state 3803 may be represented byexpression 1 (Expr. 1) as follows:α_(k)(3801)=α_(k−1)(3803)×δ₁(00)×app(00)+α_(k−1)(3805)×δ₂(01)×app(01)+α_(k−1)(3807)×δ₃(10)×app(10)+α_(k−1)(3809)×δ₄(11)×app(11).  (Expr.1)

Similarly, β_(k) can be represented by expression 2 (Expr. 2) asfollows:β_(k)(3801)=β₁(00)×β_(k+1)(3811)×app(00)+δ₅(01)×β_(k+1)(3813)×app(01)+δ₆(10)×β_(k+1)(3815)×app(10)+δ₇(11)×β_(k+1)(3817)×app(11).  (Expr.2)

FIG. 39A is a block diagram further illustrating the parallel SISOsillustrated in FIG. 26. Both SISOs, 2606 and 2608, accept channelmetrics 3905, which are provided by the metric calculator 2604. SISO2606 decodes the trellis corresponding to the encoding of the oddencoder. SISO 2608 decodes the trellis corresponding to the evenencoder. The even and odd encoders may be, for example, the even and oddencoders illustrated in FIG. 17 through FIG. 21. SISO 2606 will acceptchannel metrics corresponding to even encoded tuples and SISO 2608 willaccept channel metrics corresponding to odd tuples. SISO 2606 assignsthe zero point, i.e., the point with equally likely probability of beingany of the transmitted points, as a metric for all the even points inits trellis. Similarly, SISO 2608 assigns the 0,0 point, a point equallylikely to be any constellation point, to all odd points in its trellis.The extrinsic values 3909 computed by SISO 2606 become the A Priorivalues 3913 for SISO 2608. Similarly, the extrinsic values 3915,computed by SISO 2608, become the A Priori values 3907 for SISO 2606.After a final iteration, SISO 2606 will provide A Posteriori values 3911to the output processor 2618. Similarly, SISO 2608 will provide APosteriori values 3917 to the output processor 2618. The SISO pair ofFIG. 39A comprise an even/odd, or modulo-2 decoder. As indicatedearlier, neither the encoding nor the decoding systems disclosed herein,are limited to even and odd (modulo 2) implementations and may beextended to any size desired. To accommodate such modulo-N systems,additional SISOs may be added. Such systems may achieve even greaterparallelism then can systems employing only 1 SISO.

FIG. 39B is a block diagram of a modulo-N type decoder. A modulo-Ndecoder is one having N SISOs. A modulo-N decoder can provide paralleldecoding for parallel encoded data streams, as previously discussed.Parallel decoding systems can provide more estimates of the points beingdecoded in the same amount of time as non-parallel type systems take. InFIG. 39B, channel metrics 3951 are provided to end SISOs 3957, 3965,3973, and 3983. SISO 3973 may represent multiple SISOs. Such a modulo-Ndecoding system may have any number of SISOs desired. If a modulo-Nencoding system is paired with a modulo-N decoding system, as disclosedherein, the decoding can take place in parallel, and may providesuperior decoding for the same amount of time that a serial decoderwould use. SISO 3957 computes an extrinsic value 3955, which becomes theA Priori value 3961 for SISO 3965. SISO 3965 computes an extrinsic value3963, and then provides it as an A Priori value 3969 to SISO chain 3973.SISOs 3973 may comprise any number of SISOs configured similarly to SISO3965. The final SISO in the SISO chain 3973 provides an extrinsic value3971, which becomes an A Priori value 3977 for SISO 3983. The extrinsicvalue 3979, computed by SISO 3983, can provide an A Priori value 3953for SISO 3957. Each SISO then can provide A Posteriori values, i.e.,3959, 3967, 3981, and the series of A Posteriori values 3975, to anoutput processor such as illustrated at 2718.

FIG. 40 is a block diagram illustrating the workings of a SISO such asthat illustrated at 2606, 3957, or 2608. The inputs to the SISO 4000comprise the channel metrics 4001 and the A Priori values 4003. Both theA Priori value 4003 and the channel metrics 4001 are accepted by thealpha computer 4007. The A Priori values and channel metrics are alsoaccepted by a latency block 4005, which provides the delays necessaryfor the proper internal synchronization of the SISO 4000. The alphacomputer 4007 computes alpha values and pushes them on, and pops themfrom, a stack 4017. The output of the alpha computer also is provided toa dual stack 4009.

Latency block 4005 allows the SISO 4000 to match the latency through thealpha computer 4007. The dual stack 4009 serves to receive values fromthe latency block 4005 and the alpha computer 4007. While one of thedual stacks is receiving the values from the alpha computer and thelatency block, the other of the dual stacks is providing values to theEx. Beta values are computed in beta computer 4011, latency block 4013matches the latency caused by the beta computer 4011, the alpha to betavalues are then combined in metric calculator block 4015, which providesthe extrinsic values 4017, to be used by other SISOs as A Priori values.In the last reiteration, the extrinsic values 4017 plus the A Priorivalues will provide the A Posteriori values for the output processor.

SISO 4000 may be used as a part of a system to decode various size datablocks. In one exemplary embodiment, a block of approximately 10,0002-bit tuples is decoded. As can be readily seen, in order to compute ablock of 10,000 2-bit tuples, a significant amount of memory may be usedin storing the a values. Retention of such large amounts of data canmake the cost of a system prohibitive. Accordingly, techniques forminimizing the amount of memory required by the SISOs computation canprovide significant memory savings.

A first memory savings can be realized by retaining the I and Q valuesof the incoming constellation points within the circular buffer 2602.The metrics of those points are then calculated by the metric calculator2604, as needed. If the metrics of the points retained in the circularbuffer 2602 were all calculated beforehand, each point would compriseeight metrics, representing the Euclidian distance squared between thereceived point and all eight possible constellation points. That wouldmean that each point in circular buffer 2602 would translate into eightmetric values, thereby requiring over 80,000 memory slots capable ofholding Euclidian squared values of the metrics calculated. Such valuesmight comprise six bits or more. If each metric value comprises sixbits, then six bits times 10,000 symbols, times eight metrics persymbol, would result in nearly one-half megabit of RAM (Random AccessMemory) being required to store the calculated metric values. Bycalculating metrics as needed, a considerable amount of memory can besaved. One difficulty with this approach, however, is that in a systemof the type disclosed, that is, one capable of processing multiple typesof encodings, the metric calculator must know the type of symbol beingcalculated in order to perform a correct calculation. This problem issolved by the symbol sequencer 3413 illustrated in FIG. 34.

The symbol sequencer 3413 provides to the metric calculator 3411, and tothe input buffers 3407 and 3409, information regarding the type ofencoded tuple received in order that the metric calculator and buffers3407 and 3409 may cooperate and properly calculate the metrics of theincoming data. Such input tuple typing is illustrated in FIG. 29 throughFIG. 33, and has been discussed previously.

FIG. 41 is a graphical representation of the processing of alpha valueswithin a SISO such as illustrated at 2606, 4000 or 2608. One commonmethod for processing alpha values is to compute all the alpha values ina block. Then the final alpha values can be used with the initial betavalues in order to calculate the state metrics. If the block of datathat is being processed is large, such as the exemplary 10,000 two-bittuple block exemplarily calculated in SISO 4000, then a significantamount of memory must be allotted for storing the alpha values computed.An alternate method of processing alpha values is employed by the SISOunit 4000. In order to save memory, all the alpha values are not stored.The α value data matrix within the SISO is divided into a number ofsub-blocks. Because the sub-block size may not divide equally into thedata block size, the first sub-block may be smaller than all of thesucceeding sub-blocks which are equally sized. In the exampleillustrated in FIG. 41, the sub-block size is 125 elements. The firstsub-block numbered α 0 through α 100 is selected as having 101 elementsin order that all the other sub-blocks may be of equal size, that is 125elements. The alpha computer successively computes alpha values, α 0, α1, etc. in succession. The alpha values are not all retained but aremerely used to compute the successive alpha values. Periodically an αvalue is pushed on a stack 4103. So, for example, α value, α 100, ispushed on stack 4103 as a kind of a checkpoint. Thereafter, another 125α values are computed and not retained. The next alpha value (alpha 225)is pushed on stack 4103. This process continues in succession with every126^(th) value being pushed on stack 4103 until a point is reached inwhich the alpha computed is one sub-block size away from the end of thedata block contained within the SISO. So, for example, in the presentcase illustrated in FIG. 42, the point is reached in a block of size Nwhen α (N−125) is reached, i.e. 125 α values from the end of the block.When the beginning of this final sub-block within the SISO isencountered, all alpha values are pushed on a second stack 4009. Thestack 4009 will then contain all alpha values of the last sub-block.This situation is illustrated further in FIG. 42.

FIG. 42 is a graphical illustration of the alpha processing within theSISO 4000. The alpha values are processed in sub-blocks of data. For thepurposes of illustration, a sub-block of data is taken to be 126 alphavalues. A sub-block, however, may be of various sizes depending on theconstraints of the particular implementation desired. The alpha block ofdata is illustrated at 4200 in FIG. 42. The first step in processing thealpha block 4200 is to begin at the end of block 4215 and divide theblock 4200 into sub-blocks. Sub-blocks 4219, 4221 and 4223 areillustrated in FIG. 42. Once the block 4200 has been divided intosub-blocks marked by checkpoint values 4209, 4207, 4205, 4203 and 4201,the processing may begin. Alpha computer 4007 begins calculating alphavalues at the beginning of the block, designated by 4217. Alpha valuesare computed successively and discarded until alpha value 4209, i.e., acheckpoint value, is computed. The checkpoint value 4209 is then pushedon stack 4019. Alpha computer 4007 then continues to compute alphavalues until checkpoint value 4207 is reached. Once checkpoint value4207 is reached, it is pushed on stack 4019. The distance betweencheckpoint value 4209 and checkpoint value 4207 is 125 values, i.e., onesub-block. Similarly, alpha values are computed from 4207 to 4205 anddiscarded. Checkpoint value 4205 is then pushed on stack 4019 and theprocess continues. The alpha computer then computes alpha values andcontinues to discard them until checkpoint value 4203 is reached. Atwhich point, checkpoint value 4203 is pushed on the stack 4019. Thealpha computer once again begins computing alpha values starting withalpha value 4203 until, 125 alpha values have been computed and thebeginning of sub-block 4219 is reached. Sub-block 4219 is the finalsub-block. The alpha computer 4007 computes alpha values for sub-block4219 pushing every alpha value on stack A 4009. Because sub-block 4219contains 125 elements, once the alpha computer has computed all ofsub-block 4219, stack A will contain 125 alpha values. Once the alphavalues for sub-block 4219 have been computed, the alpha computer willthen pop value 4203 off stack 4019 and begin to compute each and everyvalue for sub-block 4221. Values for sub-block 4221 are pushed on stackB 4009. While the values for sub-block 4221 are being pushed on stack B4009, the previous values which had been pushed on stack A 4009 arebeing popped from the stack. Beta values 4211, which are computed in theopposite direction of the alpha values, are computed beginning with theend of block 4200 marked at 4215. The beta values 4211 are combined withthe alpha values, as they are popped from stack A 4009, in the extrinsiccalculator 4015. The beta values 4211 and the alpha values from stack A4009 are combined until the last alpha element has been popped fromstack A 4009. Once stack A 4009 has been emptied, it may once againbegin receiving alpha values. Checkpoint alpha value 4205 is popped fromstack 4019 and used as a starting value for the alpha computer 4007. Thealpha computer may then compute the alpha values for sub-block 4223 arepushed onto the just emptied stack A 4009. While the alpha values arebeing computed and pushed on stack A 4009, the alpha values are beingpopped from stack B 4009 and combined with beta values 4213 in extrinsiccalculator 4015.

In the manner just described, the SISO computes blocks of data onesub-block at a time. Computing blocks of data one sub-block at a timelimits the amount of memory that must be used by the SISO. Instead ofhaving to store an entire block of alpha values within the SISO for thecomputation, only the sub-block values and checkpoint values are stored.Additionally, by providing two stacks 4009 A and B, one sub-block can beprocessed while another sub-block is being computed.

FIG. 43 is a block diagram further illustrating the read-writearchitecture of the interleaver and deinterleaver of the decoder asillustrated in FIG. 26. The interleaver and deinterleaver areessentially combined utilizing eight RAM blocks 4303, 4305, 4307, 4309,4311, 4313, 4315, and 4317. The addressing of the eight RAMs iscontrolled by a central address generator 4301. The address generatoressentially produces eight streams of addresses, one for each RAM. Eachinterleaver and deinterleaver takes two sets of values and also producestwo sets of values. There are eight RAM blocks because each input tupledata point, comprising two bits, has each bit interleaved anddeinterleaved separately. As the alpha and beta computations are beingperformed in the SISOs, the a priori information is being read from aninterleaver and deinterleaver. While the information is being read froman interleaver and deinterleaver, an iteration computation is proceedingand values are being written to the interleavers and deinterleavers.Therefore, at any time point, four separate RAMs may be in the processof being written to, and four separate RAMs may be in the process ofbeing read. The generation of address sequences for theinterleaver/deinterleavers of the SISO system is somewhat complex.

FIG. 44 is a graphical illustration illustrating the generation ofdecoder sequences for the interleaver/deinterleaver addressingillustrated in FIG. 43. Since the decoder sequences are somewhat long,and may be greater than 10,000 addresses in length, short examples areused to illustrate the principles involved. A portion of the memory ofaddress generator 4301 is illustrated at 4415. Within the memory 4415,an interleave sequence is stored. The interleave sequence is stored asillustrated by arrows 4401 and 4403. That is, the interleave sequence isstored in a first direction, then in a second direction. In such amanner, address 0, illustrated at 4417 stores the interleave positionfor the first and last words of the interleave sequence. The next memorylocation, after 4417 will store the interleave position for the secondand the second to last words in the block, and so forth. The storage ofsequences is done in this manner the interleave and deinterleavesequences for encoded bit 1 is the time reversal of the interleavesequence for encoded bit 0. In such a way, interleave sequences for thetwo information bits which are ST interleaved may be stored with noincreased storage requirement over a sequence being stored for just oneof the bits, i.e. a system in which the two information bits are ITinterleaved. In such a manner, a sequence for a bit interleaver can beachieved using the same amount of data to store that sequence as wouldbe the case for a two-bit IT interleaver. Theinterleaving/deinterleaving sequence for one of the two information bitsis the time reversal of the interleaving/deinterleaving sequence for theother information bit. For the practical purposes of interleaving anddeinterleaving, the sequences thus generated are effectivelyindependent.

A second constraint that the interleave sequence has is that oddpositions interleave to odd positions and even positions interleave toeven positions in order to correspond to the encoding method describedpreviously. The even and odd sequences are used by way of illustration.The method being described can be extended to a modulo N-type sequencewhere N is whatever integer value desired. It is also desirable toproduce both the sequence and the inverse sequence without having therequirement of storing both. The basic method of generating both thesequence and the inverse sequence is to use a sequence in a first caseto write in a permuted manner to RAM according to the sequence, and inthe second case to read from RAM in a permuted manner according to thesequence. In other words, in one case the values are writtensequentially and read in a permuted manner, and in the second case theyare written in a permuted manner and read sequentially. This method isbriefly illustrated in the following. For a more thorough discussion,refer to the previous encoder discussion. In other words, an addressstream for the interleaving and deinterleaving sequence of FIG. 43 canbe produced through the expedient of writing received data sequentiallyand then reading it according to a permuted sequence, as well as writingdata according to a permuted sequence and then reading it sequentially.Additionally, even addresses must be written to even addresses and oddaddresses must be written to odd addresses in the example decoderillustrated. Of course, as stated previously, this even odd, modulo 2,scheme may be extended to any modulo level.

As further illustration, consider the sequence of elements A, B, C, D,E, and F 4409. Sequence 4409 is merely a permutation of a sequence ofaddresses 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, and so forth, that is, sequence 4411. Ithas been previously shown that sequences may be generated wherein evenpositions interleave to even positions and odd positions interleave toodd positions. Furthermore, it has been shown that modulo interleavingsequences, where a modulo N position will always interleave to aposition having the same modulo N, can be generated. Another way togenerate such sequences is to treat the even sequence as a completelyseparate sequence from the odd sequence and to generate interleavingaddresses for the odd and even sequences accordingly. By separating thesequences, it is assured that an even address is never mapped to an oddaddress or vice-versa. This methodology can be applied to modulo Nsequences in which each sequence of the modulo N sequence is generatedseparately. By generating the sequences separately, no writing to orreading from incorrect addresses will be encountered.

In the present example, the odd interleaver sequence is the inversepermutation of the sequence used to interleave the even sequence. Inother words, the interleave sequence for the even positions would be thedeinterleave sequence for the odd positions and the deinterleavesequence for the odd positions will be the interleave sequence for theeven positions. By doing so, the odd sequence and even sequence generatea code have the same distant properties. Furthermore, generating a goododd sequence automatically guarantees the generation of a good evensequence derived from the odd sequence. So, for example, examining thewrite address for one of the channels of the sequence as illustrated in4405. The sequence 4405 is formed from sequences 4409 and 4411. Sequence4409 is a permutation of sequence 4411, which is obviously a sequentialsequence. Sequence 4405 would then represent the write addresses for agiven bit lane (the bits are interleaved separately, thus resulting intwo separate bit lanes). The inverse sequence 4407 would then representthe read addresses. The interleave sequence for the odd positions is theinverse of the interleave sequence for the odd positions. So whilepositions A, B, C, D, E and F are written to, positions 0, 1, 2, 3, 4,and 5 would be read from. Therefore, if it is not desired to write theeven and odd sequence to separate RAMs, sequences 4405 and 4407 may eachbe multiplied by 2 and have a 1 added to every other position. Thisprocedure of ensuring that the odd position addresses specify only oddposition addresses and even position addresses interleave to only evenposition addresses is the same as discussed with respect to the encoder.The decoder may proceed on exactly the same basis as the encoder withrespect to interleaving to odd and even positions. All commentsregarding methodologies for creating sequences of interleaving apply toboth the encoder and decoder. Both the encoder and decoder can use oddand even or modulo N interleaving, depending on the application desired.If the interleaver is according to table 4413 with the write addressesrepresented by sequence 4405 and the read addresses represented by 4407,then the deinterleaver would be the same table 4413 with the writeaddresses represented by sequence 4407 and the read addressesrepresented by sequence 4405. Further interleave and deinterleavesequences can be generated by time reversing sequences 4405 and 4407.This is shown in table 4419. That is, the second bit may have aninterleaving sequence corresponding to a write address represented bysequence 4421 of table 4419 and a read address of 4422. Thedeinterleaver corresponding to a write sequence of 4421 and a readsequence of 4422 will be a read sequence of 4422 and a write sequence of4421.

FIG. 45 is a graphical illustration of a decoder trellis according to anembodiment of the invention. A decoder trellis, in general, representspossible states of the encoder, the likelihood of being in individualstates, and the transitions which may occur between states. In FIG. 45,the encoder represented is a turbo trellis coded modulation encoderhaving odd even interleaving and constituent encoders as illustrated inFIG. 5. In FIG. 45, a transition into state 0 at time equal to k+1 isillustrated. The likelihood that the encoder is in state 0 at time k+1is proportional to α_(k+1) (0), i.e., state 4511. To end up in state4511, at time k+1, the encoder had to be in state 0, state 1, state 2,or state 3 at time k. This is so because, as illustrated in FIG. 45, theprecursor state for state 4511 is stated 4503, 4505, 4507 or 4509 only.These transitions are in accordance with the trellis diagram of FIG. 6.Accordingly, the enter state 4511 at time k+1, the encoder must be instate 4503 and transit along path number 1, or the encoder may be instate 4505 and transition along path 2 into state 4511, or the encodermay be in state 4507 and transit along path 3 to state 4511, or theencoder may be in state 4509 and transit into state 4511. If the encoderis in state 4503, that is, state 0, at time k and the encoder receivesan input of 00, it will transition along path 1 and provide an output of000 as indicated in FIG. 45. If the encoder is in state 1 at time k,that is, state 4505, and the encoder receives an input of 10, it willtransition according to path 2 and output a value of 101. If the encoderis in state 2, corresponding to state 4507 at time k, and the encoderreceives an input of 11, then the encoder will transition along path 3into state 4511, outputting a 110. If the encoder is in state 3,corresponding to state 4509 at time k, and the encoder received an inputof a 01, then the encoder will transition along path 4 into state 4511and output a 011.

Therefore, to find the likelihood that the encoder is in state 0, i.e.,4511, at time k+1, it is necessary to consider the likelihood that theencoder was in a precursor state, that is, state 0-3, and made thetransition into state 0 at time k+1.

Likelihoods within the decoder system are based upon the Euclidiandistance mean squared between a receive point and a possible transmittedconstellation point, as illustrated and discussed with reference to FIG.35. The likelihood metrics used in the illustrative decoder (forexample, as drawn in FIG. 26) are inversely proportional to theprobability that a received point is equal to a constellation point. Toillustrate the likelihood function, consider point 3501 of FIG. 35.Point 3501 represents a received signal value in the I-Q plane. Receivedpoint 3501 does not correspond to any point in the transmittedconstellation, that is, point 3503 through point 3517. Received point3501 may in have been transmitted as any of the points 3503 through3517. The likelihood that the received point 3501 is actually point 3503is equal to the Euclidian squared distance between received point 3501and point 3503. Similarly, the likelihood that received point 3501 isany of the other points within FIG. 35 is equal to the distance betweenthe received point 3501 and the candidate point squared. In other words,the metric representing the likelihood that received point 3501 is equalto a constellation point is proportional to the distance squared betweenthe received point and any constellation point. Thus, the higher valuefor the metric, representing the distance between the received point andthe constellation point, the less likely that the received point wastransmitted as the constellation point. In other words, if the distancesquared between the received point is 0, then it is highly likely thatthe received point and the constellation point are the same point.

NOTE: Even though the received point may coincide with one constellationpoint, it may have been in fact transmitted as another constellationpoint, and accordingly there is always a likelihood that the receivedpoint corresponds to each of the points within the constellation. Inother words, no matter where received point 3501 is located in the I-Qplane, there is some finite likelihood that point 3503 was transmitted,there is some finite likelihood that point 3505 was transmitted, thereis some finite likelihood that point 3507 was transmitted, and so forth.Because the map decoder illustrated in the present disclosure is aprobabilistic decoder, all the points within a decoding trellis, such asthose illustrated in FIG. 45, have some likelihood. An iterative decodergenerally assigns likelihoods to each of the given points and only inthe last iteration are the likelihood values, that is, soft values,turned into hard values of 1 or 0. Probabilistic decoders in generalmake successive estimates of the points received and iteratively refinethe estimates. Although there are many different ways of representingthe probability or likelihood of points, the decoder of the presentembodiment uses the Euclidian distance squared in order that the Min*operation may be employed. The Min* operation is described andillustrated later in this disclosure.

Because the Euclidean distance squared is used as the likelihood metricin the present embodiment of the decoder the higher value for thelikelihood metrics indicate a lower probability that the received pointis the constellation point being computed. That is, if the metric of areceived point is zero then the received point actually coincides with aconstellation point and thus has a high probability of being theconstellation point. If, on the other hand, the metric is a high valuethen the distance between the constellation point and the received pointis larger and the likelihood that the constellation point is equal tothe received point is lower. Thus, in the present disclosure the term“likelihood” is used in most cases. The term “likelihood” as used hereinmeans that the lower value for the likelihood indicates that the pointis more probably equal to a constellation point. Put simply within thepresent disclosure “likelihood” is inversely proportional toprobability, although methods herein can be applied regardless ifprobability or likelihood is used.

In order to decide the likelihood that the encoder ended up in state4511 (i.e. state 0) at time k+1, the likelihood of being in state 0-3must be considered and must be multiplied by the likelihood of makingthe transition from the precursor state into state 4511 and multipliedby the a priori probability of the input bits. Although there is afinite likelihood that an encoder in state 0 came from state 0. There isalso a finite likelihood that the encoder in state 0 had been in state 1as a precursor state. There is also a finite likelihood that the encoderhad been in state 2 as a precursor state to state 0. There is also afinite likelihood that the encoder had been in state 3 as a precursorstate to state 0. Therefore, the likelihood of being in any given stateis a product with a likelihood of a precursor state and the likelihoodof a transition from that precursor state summed over all precursorstates. In the present embodiment there are four events which may leadto state 4511. In order to more clearly convey the method of processingthe four events which may lead to state 4511 (i.e. state 0) will begiven the abbreviations A, B, C and D. Event A is the likelihood ofbeing in state 4503 times the likelihood of making the transition fromstate 4503 to 4511. This event can be expressed as α_(k)(0)×δ_(k)(00)×the a priori probability that the input is equal to 00. α_(k)(0) isequal to the likelihood of being in state 0 at time k. δ_(k)(00) is thelikelihood, or metric, of receiving an input of 00 causing thetransition from α_(k)(0) to α_(k+1)(0). In like manner Event B is thelikelihood of being in state 4505 times the likelihood of making thetransition from state 4505 to state 4511. In other words,α_(k)(1)×δ_(k)(10)× the a priori probability that the input is equal to10. Event C is that the encoder was in state 4507 at time=k and made thetransition to state 4511 at time=k+1. Similarly, this can be statedα_(k)(2)*δ_(k)(11)× the a priori probability that the input is equal to11. Event D is that the encoder was in state 4509 and made thetransition into state 4511. In other words, α_(k)(3)*δ_(k)(01)× the apriori probability that the input is equal to 01.

The probability of being in any given state therefore, which has beenabbreviated by alpha, is the sum of likelihoods of being in a precursorstate times the likelihood of transition to the given state and the apriori probability of the input. In general, probabilistic decodersfunction by adding multiplied likelihoods.

The multiplication of probabilities is very expensive both in terms oftime consumed and circuitry used as when considered with respect to theoperation of addition. Therefore, it is desirable to substitute for themultiplication of likelihoods or probabilities the addition of thelogarithm of the probabilities or likelihoods which is an equivalentoperation to multiplication. Therefore, probabilistic decoders, in whichmultiplications are common operations, ordinarily employ the addition oflogarithms of numbers instead of the multiplications of those numbers.

The probability of being in any given state such as 4511 is equal to thesum probabilities of the precursor states times the probability oftransition from the precursor states into the present state times the aprior probability of the inputs. As discussed previously, event A is thelikelihood of being in state 0 and making the transition to state 0. Bis the event probability equivalent to being in state 1 and making thetransition to state 0. Event C is the likelihood of being in state 2 andmaking the transition to state 0. Event D is the likelihood of being instate 3 and making the transition into state 0. To determine thelikelihood of all the states at time k+1 transitions must be evaluated.That is there are 32 possible transitions from precursor states into thecurrent states. As stated previously, the likelihoods or probabilitiesof being in states and of having effecting certain transitions are allkept within the decoder in logarithmic form in order to speed thedecoding by performing addition instead of multiplication. This howeverleads to some difficulty in estimating the probability of being in agiven state because the probability of being in a given state is equalto the sum of events A+B+C+D as previously stated. Ordinarily theseprobabilities of likelihoods would be simply added. This is not possibleowing to the fact that the probability or likelihoods within the decoderare in logarithmic form. One solution to this problem is to convert thelikelihoods or probabilities from logarithmic values into ordinaryvalues, add them, and then convert back into a logarithmic values. Asmight be surmised this operation can be time consuming and complex.Instead an operation of min* is used. The min* is a variation of themore common operation of Max*. The operation of Max* is known in theart. min* is an identity similar to the Max* operation but is one whichmay be performed in the present case on log likelihood values. The min*operation is as follows.min*(A,B)=min(A,B)−1n(1+e ^(−*A−B*))

The min* operation can therefore be used to find the sum of likelihoodsof values which are in logarithmic form.

Finally, the likelihood of being in state 4511 is equal to themin*(A,B,C,D). Unfortunately, however, min* operation can only take 2operands for its inputs. Two operands would be sufficient if the decoderbeing illustrated was a bit decoder in which there were only twoprecursor states for any present state. The present decoder is of a typeof decoder, generally referred to as a symbol decoder, in which thelikelihoods are evaluated not on the basis of individual bits input tothe encoder, but on the basis of a combination, in this case pairs, ofbits. Studies have shown that the decoding is slightly improved in thepresent case when the decoder is operated as a symbol decoder over whenthe decoder is operated as a bit decoder. In reality the decoder asdescribed is a hybrid combination symbol and bit decoder.

FIG. 46A is a graphical illustration of a method for applying the min*operation to four different values. The configuration of FIG. 46Aillustrates a block diagram of a method for performing a min* operationon four separate values, A, B, C and D. As indicated in FIG. 46A atiming goal of the operation in one particular embodiment is to be ableto perform a min* operation on four operands within five nanoseconds.

FIG. 46B is a graphical illustration further illustrating the use of themin* operation. FIG. 46B the min* configuration of FIG. 46A with thevalues for A, B. C, and D substituted, which is used to determineα_(k+1)(0), that is the likelihood of being in state 0. The Four inputsto the min* operation (that is A, B, C and D) are further defined inFIG. 46B. The A term is equal to α_(k)(0) plus δ (0, 0, 0, 0), which isa metric corresponding to the generation of an output of 000 i.e., themetric value calculated by the metric calculator, plus the a priorilikelihood that bit 1 equal to 0 was received by the encoder plus thepriori likelihood that bit 0 equal 0 was received by the encoder.Because all the values illustrated are in logarithmic scale adding thevalues together produces a multiplication of the likelihood.Similarly, B=α _(k)(1)+δ(1, 0, 1)+a priori (bit 1=1)+a priori (bit 0=0)Similarly C=α _(k)(2)+δ(1, 1, 0)+a priori (bit 1=1)+a priori (bit 0=1)Similarly D=α _(k)(3)+δ(0, 1, 1)+a priori (bit 0=1)+a priori (bit 0=0).

FIG. 46B illustrates that prior to being able to perform a min*operation on the four quantifies A, B, C and D several sub quantitiesmust be added. For example, in order to obtain the value A to provide itto the min* operations the values of α_(k)(0) must be added to themetric value δ(0, 0, 0) plus the a priori probability that bit 1=0 plusthe a priori probability that bit 0=0. One way to add quantities is in acarry ripple adder as illustrated in FIG. 47.

FIG. 47 is a graphical illustration of two methods of performingelectronic addition. The first method of performing electronic additionis through the use of the carry ripple adder. A carry ripple adder hasbasically three inputs. Two inputs for each bit to be added and acarry-in input. In addition to the three inputs the carry ripple adderhas two outputs, the sum output and a carry-out output. Traditionallythe carry-out output is tied to the carry in input of the nextsuccessive stage. Because the carry-out output from one stage is coupledto the carry-in input of a second stage the carry must ripple throughthe adders in order to arrive at a correct result. Performing thecalculation illustrated at 4709 using a ripple carry adder four stagesof ripple carry adders must be employed. These stages are illustrated at4701, 4703, 4705 and 4707. It is obvious from the diagram that in orderfor a correct output to be achieved by a ripple carry adder a carry mustripple, or be propagated from the carry-out of ripple carry adder 4701through ripple carry adder 4703, through ripple carry adder 4705 andfinally into ripple carry adder 4707. Because the carry ripples earlierstages must complete their computation before the later stages canreceive a valid input for the carry in and thus compute a valid output.In contrast using the process of carry sum addition can speed theaddition process considerably. So in order to perform the addition 4709,carry save addition is performed using the format at 4711. Carry sumaddition is a process known in the art. Carry ripple addition 4705 musthave the final value ripple through 4 carry ripple adders in order toproduce a valid result. In contrast with the carry sum adder, thecomputation of the sum and carry can be carried out simultaneously.Computation of the sum and carry equation will take only one delayperiod each. It should be obvious that a carry sum adder does notproduce an output that is dependent on the numbers of digits being addedbecause no ripple is generated. Only in the last stage of carry save addwill a carry ripple effect be required. Therefore, the computationillustrated in FIG. 48B may be sped up through the substitution of acarry look ahead for a ripple carry type adder.

FIG. 48 is a block diagram in which a carry sum adder is added to a min*circuit according to an embodiment of the invention. FIG. 48 isessentially a copy of the circuit of FIG. 46B with the addition of carryripple adder 4801 and carry save adder 4803. The carry ripple adder 4801performs a carry sum add on the likelihood that an a priori (bit 0=0),the likelihood that an a priori (bit 1=0) and the likelihood of thetransition metric Δ (0,0,0).

FIG. 48 is a block diagram in which a carry sum adder is added to a Min*circuit according to an embodiment of the invention. FIG. 48 isessentially a copy of the circuit of FIG. 46B with the addition of carrysum adder 4801 and carry sum adder 4803. The carry sum adder 4801performs a carry sum add on the likelihood that an a priori (bit 0=0),the likelihood that an a priori (bit 1=0) and the likelihood of thetransition metric Δ (0,0,0). In addition, in FIG. 48 the output of theMin* operation has been split into two outputs. This splitting of theoutput will be illustrated in successive drawings. To understand why theoutputs of the Min* is split into two separate outputs it is necessaryto consider a typical Min* type operation. Such a typical Min* operationis illustrated in FIG. 49. FIG. 49 is an implementation of the Min*operation. In FIG. 49 two inputs 4901 and 4903 receive the values onwhich the Min* operation is to be performed. The values 4901 and 4903are then subtracted in a subtractor 4905. Typically such a subtractorwill involve negating one of the inputs and adding it to the otherinput. The difference between the A and B input is then provided atoutput 4907. The difference value Δ is used in both portions of the Min*operation. That is the sign bit of Δ is used to select which of theinputs A or B is the minimum. This input is then selected in a circuitsuch as multiplexer 4909. Multiplexer 4909 is controlled by the sign bitof the Δ. The output of multiplexer 4909 is the minimum of A, B. Inaddition, the Δ is used in the log calculation of ln(1+e^(−|Δ|)). Theoutput of the log calculation block 4913 is then summed with the minimumof A and B and the resulting summation is the Min* of A, B. Thisoperation too can be sped up by eliminating the adder 4911. Instead ofmaking an addition in adder 4901, the output of the log calculationblock 4913, also designated as ln_α_(k)(0) and the output of multiplexer4909 abbreviated as min_α_(k)(0). By eliminating the addition in 4911the operation of the Min* will be sped up. The addition operation muststill be performed elsewhere. The addition operation is performed withinthe Min*block 4805 in a carry save adder 4803 as illustrated in FIG. 48.Carry sum adder 4803 can work concurrently with carry save adder 4801.In other words, carry sum adder 4801 and carry sum adder 4803 operate inparallel and take the same amount of time to complete. In essence thecarry sum add 4803 can be carried on during the same time period thatcarry sum adder 4801 is operating. In this way the carry sum add 4803adds no time to the overall functioning of the circuit since it can bedone in parallel with another necessary block.

With respect to FIG. 49, although the output of the min* operator, thatis Ln_α_(k)(0), i.e. 4915 and Min_α_(k)(0), i.e. 4917 not combined untilthey are combined in adder 4911 two outputs are combined in block 4911and form the α_(k)(0) values 4913. The values 4913 represent the valuesthat are pushed on to stack 4019. As such, the operation 4911 can berelatively slow since the a values are being pushed on a stack for laterusage in any instance. In other words, the output of the min* circuit ofFIG. 49 is calculated twice. The first instance is the output of the logblock 4913 and the multiplexer block 4909 are maintained as integraloutputs 4915 and 4917. The integral outputs 4915 and 4917 are fed backto the input of the min* where they are combined with other values thatare being carried sum added.

As mentioned before, adding values to a carry sum adder does not slowdown the calculation due to a ripple affect. In other words, the more ofthe Min* operation that can be combined in carry sum adders the fasterthe operation will be over for example combining elements in a ripplecarry adder. In the instance cited, the outputs 4915 and 4917 arecombined in a number of carry sum adders in order to make the operationof the multiple additions fast.

FIG. 50 is a graphical illustration of a portion of two Min* circuitsillustrated generally at 5001 and 5003. In the circuit of 5001 A and Bare combined but it is assumed that B is larger than A and the value Δwill always be positive. In the second circuit it is assumed that thevalue of A will be larger than B and hence the Δ in circuit 5003 willalways be positive. It is obvious that both assumptions cannot becorrect. It is also obvious that one of the two assumptions must becorrect. Accordingly, the circuit is duplicated and then a mechanism,which will be described later, is used to select the circuit that hasmade the correct assumption. In addition, in assuming that Δ values ineither circuit 5001 or 5003 will be positive computation 5005 and 5007can be started based on the assumption that Δ is a positive value. If Δis a positive value then the process of computation of the log quantityof 5005 or 5007 can start when the first bit is produced by thecomparison between A and B. In other words, it is not necessary for theentire value to be computed in order to start the calculations in blocks5005 and 5007. Of course, one of the calculations will be incorrect, andwill have to be discarded. Once the least significant bit has beenproduced by the comparison between A and B, the least significant bit of.delta. can be placed in the calculation block 5005 or 5007 and the logcalculation started. By not waiting until the entire Δ value has beenproduced, the process of computation can be further sped up.

Once the value of Δ 5107 is computed, it can be used in the calculationin block 5113. In order to compute the value in block 5113 properly, thevalue of Δ needs to be examined. In order to take the absolute value ofΔ, Δ must be negated if it is less than 0. In other operations where Δis positive, the process of taking its absolute value can be eliminatedand hence the overall circuit sped up. Therefore, if it was known apriori whether A or B was larger it would be easy to arrange thoseinputs so that the value of Δ was always positive, thus minimizing thetime that circuit 5113 must take for its computation. Since block 5113the computation takes longer than the process of operating themultiplexer 5009 with the sign bit of the .delta. value of 5007. Sincethere is no way to determine a priori which value will be larger A or Bthere is no way to arrange the circuit so that the value of .delta. willalways be positive. However, although it is not known a priori whichwill be larger A or B duplicate circuits can be fabricated based on theassumption that A is larger than B and a second assumption that B islarger than A. Such a circuit is illustrated in FIG. 51.

The β values to be calculated in a similar fashion to the α value andall comments with respect to speeding up α calculations pertain to βcalculations. The speed of the α computation and the speed of the betacomputation should be minimized so that neither calculation takessignificantly longer than the other. In other words, all speed-uptechniques that are applied to the calculation of α values may beapplied to the calculation of beta values in the reverse direction.

The calculation of the logarithmic portion of the min* operationrepresents a of the log function. Approximating a function by using alook-up table is one way of speeding a complex mathematical calculation.In the table it is seen that any value of delta larger than 1.25 orsmaller than 1.25 will result in a log output equal to point 5.Therefore, instead of actually calculating the value of the logarithmicportion of the Min* the table of FIG. 51A can be used.

FIG. 51A is a α-β log table which contain look-up value for thecalculation of the log portion of the Min* operation. The table of FIG.51A also illustrates that the value of Δ need only be known to theextent of its three least significant bits. Therefore, the value of thelogarithm out can be calculated quickly by noticing if bits B₄ throughB₁ are not all zeros and B₄ through B₁ are not all ones then the valueof delta lies in a range that would make the value of the logarithmequal to 0.5. Such a calculation can be accomplished in the logsaturation block 5113 through the use of a simple combinational logic.Blocks 5109 and 5111 in FIG. 51 represent the calculation of thelogarithm of the minus delta value and the calculation logarithm of theplus delta value. The valid calculation, between 5109 and 5111, isselected by multiplexer 5115.

Multiplexer 5105 also is controlled by the value of Δ as is multiplexer5115. Multiplexer 5115 can be controlled by bit 3 of Δ (Any error causedby the selection of the wrong block 5109 or 5111 by using bit 3 insteadof α9, the sign bit, is made up for in the log saturation block 5113.How this works can be determined by consider FIG. 51B.

FIG. 51B is a graphical illustration of a table used in the logsaturation of FIG. 51. In RANGE#2 and RANGE#4 where in_out is 0, Δ3selects the right range for in_out (i.e., when it's 0, it select log(+value) for in/out to be 0, and when it's 1 it selects log(−value) forin_out to be 0). In RANGE#1 (i.e., +value), when Δ3 changes from 0 to 1,this would select incorrectly log(−value) for the MUX output. However,the selected (MUX) output is overwritten at the OR gate by the LogSaturation block. This Log Saturation block detects that Δ8:3 is not all0's (e.g., it's 000001) then it would force the in_out to be 1 which isthe right value of RANGE#1.

Similarly, for RANGE#4 (i.e., −value), when Δ3 changes from 1 to 0, itwould select in correctly the log (+value) for the MUX output. However,the selected (MUX) output is overwritten at the OR gate by the LogSaturation block. This Log Saturation block detects that Δ8:3 is not all1's (e.g., it's 111110) when it would force the in/out to be 1 which isthe right value for RANGE #4. The sign bit of Δ controls whether A or Bis selected be passed through the output. The input to the A and Badders 5101 and 5103 are similar to that shown in FIG. 48. A and B formsums separately so that the correct sum may be selected by multiplexer5105. In contrast the carry sum adder 5107 can accept all the inputs toA and B in order to calculate Δ. Of course, one of the inputs must be intwo's compliment form so that the subtraction of A minus B can beaccomplished. In other words, either the A or B values can be negatedand two's complimented and then add to the other values in order to formthe Δ value. The negating of a value is a simple one gate operation.Additionally, the forming of a two's compliment by adding one isrelatively simple because in the carry sum addition first stage isassumed to have a carry of zero. By assuming that that carry is equal toone instead of a zero a two's complimentary value can be easily formed.

FIG. 52 is a graphical illustration and circuit diagram indicating theway in which α values within the SISO are normalized. As the α valueswithin the SISOs tend to converge the values in the registers patrol theα values have a tendency to grow between iterations. In order to keepthe operation of the SISO as economical as possible in terms of speedand memory usage, the value stored in the α register should be kept assmall as only needed for the calculations to be performed. One method ofdoing this is the process called normalization. The process ofnormalization in the present embodiment occurs when the high order bitof the value in all the α registers is 1. This condition indicates thatthe most significant bit in each α register is set. Once the conditionwhere all of the bits in all of the α registers are set and all of themost significant bits can be immediately reset in order to subtract aconstant value from each of the values within the α registers. Such aprocess can be done using subtraction of course, but that would involveaddition delays. The process illustrated in FIG. 52 involves no suchaddition delays. Once the all most significant α bits condition isdetected by AND gate 5201, multiplexer 5203 can be activated.Multiplexer 5203 takes bits B₀ through B₈ from the output of the Min*block 5205. However, in the case where normalization is performed, onlythe values B₀ through B₈ are accepted from Min* block 5205 by themultiplexer 5203. Value for B₈ is accepted from a constant value 0 inthe case where the normalization AND gate 5201 is activated. In such amanner a constant value can be subtracted from each of the α registerswithout increasing any cycle time of the overall decoder circuit.

In view of the above detailed description of the invention andassociated drawings, other modifications and variations will now becomeapparent. It should also be apparent that such other modifications andvariations may be effected without departing from the spirit and scopeof the invention.

1. A method for producing a coded signal from a sequence of tuples, themethod comprising: modulo interleaving input tuples in at least oneinterleaver encoding the input tuples in an odd encoder and an evenencoder; encoding to interleaved tuples in the odd encoder and to evenencoder; selecting to encoded tuples from each of to odd encoder and toeven encoder; and mapping the selected, encoded tuples using at leastone mapping, wherein only encoded tuples corresponding to input tupleshaving an odd modulo sequence designation are selected from the oddencoder and only encoded tuples corresponding to input tuples having aneven modulo sequence designation are selected from the even encoder. 2.The method of claim 1, wherein: the encoding the interleaved tuples inthe odd encoder and the even encoder includes systematic encoding asequence of N tuples, where N is an integer number.
 3. The method ofclaim 1, wherein: the encoding the interleaved tuples in the odd encoderand the even encoder includes nonsystematic encoding.
 4. The method ofclaim 1, wherein: the encoding the interleaved tuples in the odd encoderand the even encoder includes convolutional encoding.
 5. The method ofclaim 1, wherein: the encoding the interleaved tuples in the odd encoderand the even encoder includes recursive encoding.
 6. The method of claim1, wherein: the selecting the encoded tuples from each of the oddencoder and the even encoder includes puncturing at least one bit outputfrom at least one of the odd encoder and the even encoder.
 7. The methodof claim 6, wherein: the puncturing at least one bit output from atleast one of the odd encoder and the even encoder includes substitutingat least one uncoded bit for the at least one punctured bit.
 8. Themethod of claim 1, further comprising: mapping a first selected tuple ofthe selected tuples to a first constellation whose constellation pointshave a first mapping; and mapping a second selected tuple of theselected tuples to a second constellation whose constellation pointshave a second mapping.
 9. The method of claim 1, further comprising:inverting at least one interleaved tuple of the interleaved tuplesbefore encoding the at least one interleaved tuple in the odd encoder.10. The method of claim 1, further comprising: inverting at least oneinput tuple of the input tuples before encoding the at least one inputtuple in the even encoder.
 11. The method of claim 1, wherein: themethod is performed within a communication device.
 12. The method ofclaim 1, wherein: the at least one mapping includes an 8-PSK (PhaseShift Keying) constellation having 8 constellation points; or the atleast one mapping includes a 16-QAM (Quadrature Amplitude Modulation)constellation having 16 constellation points.
 13. The method of claim 1,wherein: the selecting the encoded tuples from each of the odd encoderand the even encoder includes puncturing at least one bit output fromthe odd encoder and at least one bit output from the even encoder. 14.The method of claim 1, wherein: the at least one interleaver includes afirst interleaver and a second interleaver; at least one input tuple ofthe input tuples includes a first bit and a second bit; the firstinterleaver interleaves the first bit; and the second interleaverinterleaves the second bit.
 15. An apparatus, comprising: at least oneinterleaver implemented to modulo interleave input tuples; a firstencoder implemented to encode the input tuples and the interleavedtuples; a second encoder implemented to encode the input tuples and theinterleaved tuples; a selector implemented to select encoded tuples fromeach of the first encoder and the second encoder; and a mapperimplemented to map the selected, encoded tuples using at least onemapping; and wherein; only encoded tuples corresponding to input tupleshaving an odd modulo sequence designation are selected from the firstencoder and only encoded tuples corresponding to input tuples having aneven modulo sequence designation are selected from the second encoder.16. The apparatus of claim 15, further comprising: an inverterimplemented to invert at least one interleaved tuple of the interleavedtuples before the first encoder encodes the at least one interleavedtuple.
 17. The apparatus of claim 15, further comprising: an inverterimplemented to invert at least one input tuple of the input tuplesbefore the second encoder encodes the at least one input tuple.
 18. Theapparatus of claim 15, wherein: the at least one mapping includes an8-PSK (Phase Shift Keying) constellation having 8 constellation points;or the at least one mapping includes a 16-QAM (Quadrature AmplitudeModulation) constellation having 16 constellation points.
 19. Theapparatus of claim 15, further comprising: a puncturing moduleimplemented to puncture at least one bit output from at least one of thefirst encoder and the second encoder.
 20. The apparatus of claim 15,further comprising: a puncturing module implemented to puncture at leastone bit output from the first encoder and at least one bit output fromthe second encoder.